garyinderry
Ryder Cup Winner
he can only do a medal round. how can he even be considered to be a part of the competition as we as yet dont know how many shots to take off to find out his nett score!
Of course the guy is entitled to play if he has paid his membership, thats not the issue for me. I think the club has made a poor job of the new members induction, to send a new golfer who has hardly held a golf club in his hands before out in a medal match is poor. He will probably not enjoy it and may feel he is a hinderance to his group, it also very unsafe to have someone unexperienced hitting golfballs. I know I would have not liked the experience if I was in his situation.
This just would not happen in my club. At his interview his needs to get him playing to a level where he would start enjoying the game and not be a danger to others would have been considered. A program of lessons with the Pro and rounds with experienced players would have been made where he could qualify his handicap in a more relaxed, enjoyable and structured manner.
Absolute PANTS with a capital P. This newbie has payed his fees, he's entitled to play in the medal, he's entitled to get a handicap, he's entitled to learn and practice, he's entitled to be part of the club and that includes meeting new members. The pro has done nothing wrong. That is a fact. The pro has introduced a new member irrespective of his playing ability to two faces and fellow members.
The pro has got the new member a game and it's up to the OP and the other playing partner how they react to it.
Unecessarily rude.
All the whinging on here about slow play and here you are encouraging a complete and utter novice to go out and play a medal with two complete strangers on a course he has never played before.
You're telling me that you would be delighted with that? If you say yes, you're the one talking pants.
I've been Lady Captain and helped plenty of novices.
I've guaranteed to play at least once a week with them for as long as they want.
Given them confidence and a solid grounding in the basic rules.
That's not stuffy and it's not elitism
Rude??? Grow up. The fact is he's a member of a golf club, he's entitled to play in ANY competition. End of discussion. Congrats on being Lady Captain, shows how elite your attitude is that you feel the need to mention it. I'm in awe.
:fore:
What many are forgetting here - and I mean this with all due respect to 28'ers - is that just having a 28 handicap doesn't automatically mean you can go round in 100. Just because you've put your 3 cards in - they may be 120, 130 and 140, is no reason to assume that next time you go out you're not going to score something similar.
The Guy could have been a seasoned 28'er who's never broken 120 before.
Would that have made a difference..?
to be honest i couldn't care less what gear he had it was just they way i was stuck with him,i see not many coming forward to say they would have played with him!!!!
It clearly is an issue with you and one of the reasons that golf has a "stuffy blazer and tie" image. Whether you would have liked the experience or not a member of any ability can enter a medal and play. Get on with it, accept and play plus encourage the new member.
yes no problem that is a different situation but to to brutally honest this chap really doesn't seem that interested in the GAME more being a member of a golf club.I think you have a point, his first round of golf shouldn't have been a medal. That said, your argument is lost in the pomposity of your original post.
If you had been asked to help introduce a new member to the game/club in a social knock would you have agreed??
what would you have said if you were told in advance your round would take over 5 hours and the chap you were playing with had never ever played golf in his life and didn't know any rules or how to conduct himself on the course or if you waited you could be put with another group?At our place, as far as I remember, you get three rounds in with other members signing your card, and then you can play in any comp. Same rules for everyone, so no-one can say, "I've paid my subs.." and expect to play.
If that rule doesn't apply at the OP's club, then that's a shame, but the newbie is entitled to play and therefore entitled to a bit of courtesy or even encouragement. Maybe the pro could have suggested that the newbie have a lesson or two, or even suggest playing in the stablefords rather than the medals until he had his handicap.
But even then, once he's got his handicap of 28, he'll only have played on grass 3 or 4 times, so he'll still be hitting 100+, right? So when is he able to play?
The fact that he had all the gear shouldn't have entered in to it, and that's where the OP's comments become less than constructive and more like jealousy.
Yes, I'm sure it can't have been pleasant, but then let's ask this question:
How many of us never shoot above handicap by more than 10 shots? What about 20? Last year, off 15, I shot a 106. I can imagine some people thinking "15 h/cap my arse!", and therein lies the main problem. We can all hack it around when the swings not working.
Maybe we should introduce the Netherlands approach, which forces you to get a "licence" to play golf? They teach you the basics, the rules, the etiquette, etc. Okay, so it may put some people off, but having played golf in the Netherlands, it certainly works.
What I can say is that I have never hated playing golf with anyone because of their ability or lack of. I have, however, hated playing with bigoted, racist or bragging egotists...