TigerTime
Well-known member
His obvious win yesterday at the Amex yet again brings up more questions. How good is he compared to the greats? When all is said and done and his careers over, what will his achievements look like in comparison? Of course, it might be too early to say but some things to consider...
His ball striking is elite, his game from tee to green is comparable to peak Tiger, Rory, Hogan and Nicklaus. He is consistently number one in strokes gained tee to green. He is often number one in total strokes gained. He is dominant in his approach play, driving and scrambling statistically. Most players are elite in 1-2 areas, he is elite in 3-4 areas. He is elite in everything except putting and still wins, and even then his putting has improved over the last few years. Even when he doesn't win he is always there. He is consistent. Constantly top 10, very very rarely outside contention.
He usually doesn't win with heaters or putting weeks. He wins with control and that is historically significant because Tiger won with domination, Nicklaus won with strategy, Hogan with precision. Scheffler does it with structural superiority. He doesn't ever seem to spike and he just suffocates the rest of the field.
We are of course somewhat early in his career, and the best may be yet to come, which is worrying if you are out there on tour. He's probably the next grand slam winner, might even be this year. Then it's a case of how many can he get? How close does he get to Tiger and Jack? They of course dominated over long periods of time, Scheffler has been dominating for 3 years or so.
I think he will end up pretty close, he won't over take Tiger and Jack, but he'll be there or thereabouts which in the modern era could be argued is just as good. He might not be the flashiest or the most famous or even the most loved among some but he might be one of the most dominant ever and I think that deserves respect. Maybe we won't realise what we are actually witnessing until his career is over but of course, like anything in sport things can change quickly.
His ball striking is elite, his game from tee to green is comparable to peak Tiger, Rory, Hogan and Nicklaus. He is consistently number one in strokes gained tee to green. He is often number one in total strokes gained. He is dominant in his approach play, driving and scrambling statistically. Most players are elite in 1-2 areas, he is elite in 3-4 areas. He is elite in everything except putting and still wins, and even then his putting has improved over the last few years. Even when he doesn't win he is always there. He is consistent. Constantly top 10, very very rarely outside contention.
He usually doesn't win with heaters or putting weeks. He wins with control and that is historically significant because Tiger won with domination, Nicklaus won with strategy, Hogan with precision. Scheffler does it with structural superiority. He doesn't ever seem to spike and he just suffocates the rest of the field.
We are of course somewhat early in his career, and the best may be yet to come, which is worrying if you are out there on tour. He's probably the next grand slam winner, might even be this year. Then it's a case of how many can he get? How close does he get to Tiger and Jack? They of course dominated over long periods of time, Scheffler has been dominating for 3 years or so.
I think he will end up pretty close, he won't over take Tiger and Jack, but he'll be there or thereabouts which in the modern era could be argued is just as good. He might not be the flashiest or the most famous or even the most loved among some but he might be one of the most dominant ever and I think that deserves respect. Maybe we won't realise what we are actually witnessing until his career is over but of course, like anything in sport things can change quickly.
