C
c1973
Guest
.......and you Sir never provided a link.
Do what you usually tell others (when you actually do respond) then, Google it.
.......and you Sir never provided a link.
Do what you usually tell others (when you actually do respond) then, Google it.
OK over to you.........proof of her saying it please................ one minor Whitehall officer trying ingratiate himself with his boss's thinking.
Unless you know better.
Why are the Foreign Office saying no memo exists?
No link then.
OK lets all calm down a bit and base this on Phil's courtroom.
We have either The Foreign Office, Nicola Sturgeon, The UK French Ambassador and the Edinburgh French Consul all telling the truth.
or
Some minor Whitehall officer telling the truth.
Who would you bet your house on?
No link then.
OK lets all calm down a bit and base this on Phil's courtroom.
We have either The Foreign Office, Nicola Sturgeon, The UK French Ambassador and the Edinburgh French Consul all telling the truth.
or
Some minor Whitehall officer telling the truth.
Who would you bet your house on?
We have a document so far and that's it
You have to prove the document and what is being said is false
You are the one making the accusations so provide the proof that you know it's false
This is a woman that belongs to a party that agreed to accept the Scottish people's No vote for Independance only to back track in less than a week and suggest that they will have another go ignoring the democratic wishes of the Scots.
Why should anyone ever believe her or her party ever again.
No link then
I'm not really sure exactly what you lot are arguing about,
Made me laugh!
I guess people have just had enough of Doon making statements without actually providing proof to back them up
Either he is doing on purpose to wind people up - wouldnt surprise me
Or he feels he doesn't need to provide the proof ?
Either way some of the statements are ridiculous and try and suggest under hand tricks from UK government and people towards Scotland which does nothing but get people's backs up
I've actually caught up a bit on the story and it does appear there are some shenanigans going on.
making statements without actually providing proof to back them up
Either he is doing on purpose to wind people up - wouldnt surprise me
Or he feels he doesn't need to provide the proof ?