• We'd like to take this opportunity to wish you a Happy Holidays and a very Merry Christmas from all at Golf Monthly. Thank you for sharing your 2025 with us!

Is this the future of Golf

as opposed to ?

1 drive it 330 yards into rough that is barely covering half the ball.
2 smash ball with a wedge to the middle of a soft green and soon it back 5 yards to much whooping and shouting
3 hit a putt 6 feet straight at the hole, knowing that a miss will only leave you 1 foot away.

Nope can't see the enjoyment in that.


The us open is usually down to course management most of the time, and if players don't have any way of changing their usual methods then they get punished. They need to learn how to take their time and minimise mistakes, taking the opportunities on the pins/holes that give a chance.

I agree but some of it is just plain tedious, there's no risk/reward, just ultra conservative or double bogey. The RBC at harbour town is a good example of a tournament that gets it right.
 
I think they mostly got it right. Pros having to hit drivers to par 3s is a bit silly in my book, the rough at times looked virtually impossible to get out of and seeing pros hack it forwards 20 yards out of said rough isn't really my idea of fun. Plus the pin placement on a few holes was just ridiculous and did not encourage any golfer to fire at them so you were looking at a par at best on some holes. I am sure the chap who set it up was interviewed before hand and said that in addition to the stern test he also wanted the give the golfers chances to get birdies so there was some excitement in the rounds. Well I didn't see too much of that.

But then again it asked them to play shots they don't normally do and called for a different more patient approach to the usual target golf you get in most tournaments nowadays. I'd of preferred the winner to be under par, but then again prefer the winning score last night to someone shooting 17 under par.
 
Not sure all the comments about driver on par 3's are valid. How many actually hit driver on the par 3, only one I saw was Luke (who is not the longest of the pro's) and he missed the green by a long way. At 266, most of them are hitting long irons and many of them hit 300 yards with there 3woods most weeks on the tour. Difference this week? They didn't want to be off the fairways, so hit shorter. Doesn't explain why Luke etc felt it necessary to hit driver on a 266 yard par 3 though!
 
It´s like F1, there are tracks that are boring, where if you make a mistake there is lots of tarmac around, them there is Monaco,
where great control is a must, and any mistake is payed at the spot, only great players with great ball control, not only off the tee
but every were mostly important those NOT FLAT GREENS! that wedge play have to be sharp and putting equally. that is the pinnacle of the game, and were it gets boring week in week out.
 
Not sure all the comments about driver on par 3's are valid. How many actually hit driver on the par 3, only one I saw was Luke (who is not the longest of the pro's) and he missed the green by a long way. At 266, most of them are hitting long irons and many of them hit 300 yards with there 3woods most weeks on the tour. Difference this week? They didn't want to be off the fairways, so hit shorter. Doesn't explain why Luke etc felt it necessary to hit driver on a 266 yard par 3 though!

There were several who hit driver, Mahan was another.

It required around 270 carry with the wind, so that explains why they hit the driver, as the 3 wood wouldnt reach.

Simples ;-)
 
The par 3 was playing over 270 on Sunday and into the wind.
The problem is where was the option on playing a 2 shotter? It was green or dead in thick rough, no lay up area. I get all the comments that what the par is set at is irrelevant, just what they actually score. But there was no option other than to go at the green. Some may have taken a 2 shot strategy had it been an option.
 
The course was setup so you had to hit the fairway to give yourself any chance of going for the pin positions. Too many courses in the US are setup so even if your in the rough it's so short the ball sits up and they can still go for the pin.
It shows that courses don't need to be made longer, they need to made tighter, so that it's a test of accuracy not just a test of who can whack it the furthest.
Merion showed that to great effect and I hope the USPGA realise they can make courses harder without constantly pushing tees back and club manufacturers start working on making clubs go straighter not longer.
 
Merion showed that to great effect and I hope the USPGA realise they can make courses harder without constantly pushing tees back and club manufacturers start working on making clubs go straighter not longer.

Oh don't talk such rot. If Rose didn't have a speed pocket in the Stage 2 RBZ 3 wood when playing that shot just off the green on the 18th, that chip may have finished at least a foot short. Yes, not so dismissive of TM extra yards claim now are we???
 
If the aim was to humble the worlds best it was mission accomplished... Wouldn't wish to watch similiar week in week out... Once in a while is OK though... Loved the look of the course but wouldn't wish to play it as it was set up for the pro's...
 
If the pros could actually hit a fairway with an iron in hand someone might have gone under par. The amount of times an iron off the tee ended up in the rough was just stupid. Has the modern pro sacrificed accuracy with the longer clubs in favour of just bombing it out there as far as possible?
 
The commentators whitter on about the rough just off the greens, but isn't that what we normally play out of? It is for me. Went worth was a Joke, 20 yards through the green, and they were pretty much on the fairway. Not golf as I know it. This is more like golf round my course, and guess what? They can't hack it.

Thought the whole course looked more like we're used to over here, I know we don't get the same types of grasses unless they're specially planted, like you say I around the greens I didn't really see anything out of the ordinary to us pay-to-play-hackers!
 
Not a fan of a par 3 the pros can't hit. If they made that a risk reward par 4 then it would be a better option or just move the tee forward and make it a 230 yarder. Aside from that it is very good to watch the course punish players and reward good shots

It was difficult to hit because the wind was directly into the tee.
There was a long par 3 later on in the course that was well over 200 yards and players were going in with a 6-iron.

The course length was 6996 yards. If it had been 5 yards longer, would people be calling it long or short?
 
If the pros could actually hit a fairway with an iron in hand someone might have gone under par. The amount of times an iron off the tee ended up in the rough was just stupid. Has the modern pro sacrificed accuracy with the longer clubs in favour of just bombing it out there as far as possible?

Well said.

Also, how many putts were left short on the last two days, the majority from what I could see. I also enjoyed it, no other turnament I can think of has such low scoring, so it's nice for a change.
 
Sick of seeing pros bombing it all over the place and playing the same shot out of the rough as they do on the fairway because the rough is so tame. Hitting it in the stands and getting free drops on a nice patch of grass gets on my nerves too.

The rough should be rough and hard to play from, some of the greens were slightly silly but apart from that it was great. Golf is meant to be a hard game!
 
I thought the course was good and really enjoyed watching some of the players trying to craft shots and rescue from situations we don't normally see. BTW went there a few experts saying that the scores would be mega low before the event as the pro's would bomb round it easily?
 
Well all the experts were blabbering on about '62', Tiger slotted in as favourite, but the shortest course in years as brought the top golfers in the world to their knees, making Dufner chuck his club in the water, I've just watched Rory turn one of his irons into scrap (come back Titleist), Donald using a driver on a Par3, and many more racking up my sort of score when I play. With this in mind can the governing bodies stop going on about superlong courses, different balls for Pro's or different clubs. There is another way! The Pro's might be on Vallium and burnt out at 38 though.

Think you've got to be careful as going down the Merion route too often would result in courses becoming 'tricked-up' as pros adapted their games accordingly. And I for one am not a fan of tricked-up golf. US greens for me are verging on 'tricked-up' - and I can envisage rough being grown and cut likewise. I see a differentiation between 'protecting' a golf course and tricking it up. The way Merion was set up was interesting and made for me good viewing - but I wouldn't want to see too much tournamenrt golf played on courses set up that way.
 
Top