Is this racism?

[PhilTheFragger]

Now where did i put my BAN HAMMER ?

 

[Kellfire]

Not going to apologise Phil as the guy adds nothing but just likes to be controversial

If you think being anti-Tommy Robinson is controversial then I think you need to reassess your logic.

 

[Pin-seeker]

If you think being anti-Tommy Robinson is controversial then I think you need to reassess your logic.

Think he’s looking at the bigger picture & the way that you like to be controversial & argue to the toss at every opportunity.
Craving attention maybe?

 

[Kellfire]

Think he’s looking at the bigger picture & the way that you like to be controversial & argue to the toss at every opportunity.
Craving attention maybe?

Yet you’re the one sensationalising things by saying I like to “be controversial & argue to the toss at every opportunity”. Be a bit more introspect.

 

[PhilTheFragger]

Yet you’re the one sensationalising things by saying I like to “be controversial & argue to the toss at every opportunity”. Be a bit more introspect.

I think it just exploded , is there a face palm emoji?

If you can’t take it back, don’t dish it out in the first place.

 

[Dando]

View attachment 29541
I think it just exploded , is there a face palm emoji?

If you can’t take it back, don’t dish it out in the first place.

No but there’s a clown one that will do the job

 

[Kellfire]

View attachment 29541
I think it just exploded , is there a face palm emoji?

If you can’t take it back, don’t dish it out in the first place.

Oh I can take it where it’s warranted. But when someone’s wrongly point scoring from rape... erm.

 

[Robster59]

Oh I can take it where it’s warranted. But when someone’s wrongly point scoring from rape... erm.

The only one that's reading that into this.

Yea, as I assumed. You side with Robinson. Ugh.

For me, this reads like "If you ain't for us, you're agin us".

 

[Kellfire]

The only one that's reading that into this.

For me, this reads like "If you ain't for us, you're agin us".

I explained why I took this view.

 

[Robster59]

I explained why I took this view.

An explanation isn't the same as a justification. Perhaps you should consider before you post.

 

[Dando]

I explained why I took this view.

read the report into the Rotherham scandal where staff were too scared to say anything in fear of being called racist

 

[Kellfire]

read the report into the Rotherham scandal where staff were too scared to say anything in fear of being called racist

People being stupid or negligent is not the same as a government cover up to covertly ease in Sharia Law which is how the likes of Tommy and the boys spin it.

 

[Kellfire]

An explanation isn't the same as a justification. Perhaps you should consider before you post.

Perhaps you should consider that it’s ok to differing views and that being challenged on isn’t always a bad thing. I don’t slink out of these threads feeling all offended by what people say.

 

[Dando]

People being stupid or negligent is not the same as a government cover up to covertly ease in Sharia Law which is how the likes of Tommy and the boys spin it.

there was a council cover up

 

[Robster59]

Perhaps you should consider that it’s ok to differing views and that being challenged on isn’t always a bad thing. I don’t slink out of these threads feeling all offended by what people say.

Anyone who knows me will tell you I look at all opposing views, often to the frustration of my missus, I just consider all the options first before posting and leaping to conclusions.

 

[Kellfire]

there was a council cover up

And was it found they were trying to install Sharia Law?

 

[Dando]

And was it found they were trying to install Sharia Law?

the report had nothing to do with Sharia Law it was about the abuse of schoolgirls that the Labour Council ignored as they didn't want to be seen as racist