DeanoMK
Club Champion
Good news and glad you've found something that works. However I would counter that the two triples indicates its not a silver bullet and as I've mentioned it's not something that sits well in my own golfing brain and not for me. I would rather play and take the driver/3 wood off the tee depending on whats required and take it from there. I can still make a double and triple too but having a shorter shot in, I feel makes the approach a safer option
As Canary_Yellow rightly points out I am not a long hitter (average about 220 yards) and so there are still some par 4's I struggle to hit and all our par 5's are three shotters. However on my own course I know where the misses are both off the tee and with the long second shots and can align and plan accordingly. I would still rather get maximum distance off a tee and with a second and leave a simple short shot in. Horses for courses and I am not going to discourage anyone from trying something different, especially as an advocate of the linear method, but I do feel strongly that the concept has to sit well to commit to it. This doesn't with me. It's as simple as that
The first triple was due to me trying a bit of a 'hero shot', completely going against what I was trying to do and it cost me, so that was a valuable lesson.
The second was a 3 off the tee as I hooked my tee shot with my 5 wood, mainly due to me trying to play a draw (based on the lessons I've been having lately) and over-cooked it. And in all honesty it was a short par 4 so in reality I could have hit my 6 iron and still would have had a comfortable number into the green.
I'm all in