Annika Sorenstam's putter continued to fail her at times in the second round of the U.S. Women's Open on Friday, but she finished five shots better than her first round and left herself within striking distance despite taking the same number of putts as the previous day.
Her round could have and should have been even better if not for that darn putter.
I thought the stats were from participating TOUR pros, not just a bunch of hackers??Interesting article regarding the Pro's but those stats are as a collective and in that collective are good and bad putters.
18 pars, no birdies is most acceptable in my book.
Jack Nicklaus never had 3 putts. Even when he was reminded of a time he did, in his mind he never 3 putted. Positive thinking is what it's all about.Every golfer has three putts, a good putter is someone who can't wait to get on the green, someone who doesn't follow the rubbish about putting stokes and doesn't have the fear ingrained in him.
18 pars, no birdies is most acceptable in my book.
You won't shoot 66 with that attitude!![]()
18 pars, no birdies is most acceptable in my book.
You won't shoot 66 with that attitude!![]()
His course is Par 65![]()
spot on for me, i'm a hellish putter and always try and line up with the line on the ball then hit and hope. not great advice but I do it and when I miss go straight in without thinking and often miss again from 3 feet. 50% of a round is putting but I never practice the art. could maybe knock 10 off a round if I did.A bit of that certainly. I think we expect our putting to make up for other mistakes. Poor drive, poor second, ok ish chip, damn, if only I could putt that would have been a par.
It wasn't the putting, it was the other 3 shots!
I thought the stats were from participating TOUR pros, not just a bunch of hackers??Interesting article regarding the Pro's but those stats are as a collective and in that collective are good and bad putters.
I thought the stats were from participating TOUR pros, not just a bunch of hackers??Interesting article regarding the Pro's but those stats are as a collective and in that collective are good and bad putters.
Tour Pros or Hackers the point I was trying to make is a good putter holes 8 out of 10 and the poor putter 4 out of 10 and the stats say the average is 6 out of 10.Doesn't tell you who's good(Poulter) or who's poor(Sergio)
I know what I mean![]()