D
Deleted Member 1156
Guest
I don't know about the sample size, but regardless of how big it is you'd say it was too small, or too big, or the wrong type of golfer.
That is a very sweeping statement, why do you think that?
I don't know about the sample size, but regardless of how big it is you'd say it was too small, or too big, or the wrong type of golfer.
Fair point.............
But that's why I always question when people claim how far they hit it. PLayed with a lot of different golfers over the years and found only a handful that outhit me. But on the internet there's a lot that claim to outhit me by 20-30 yards, maybe I've not had the pleasure of their company on the course yet. I'm not for one minute saying they are all full of crap, just most of them.........![]()
There's some on here that seem to get mixed up between anecdotal evidence and empirical evidence. Just because you've seen some old coffin dodger like me hit x yards doesn't mean Joe Average hits it x yards. Its a fact I hit it x yards but it has almost zero effect on the average guy. And using the old coffin dodger example to argue against an average is just plain rubbish.
Get 500,000 coffin dodgers hitting it x yards and it'll give you empirical evidence, and it will give you a truer average.
As an aside, I hit a half decent ball that is up the with most golfers. Strangely enough the yardages in the article, although they appear short, are accurate for me. I'd seriously question many Billybigboots that say they hit it 280yds. Some will, but in my experience most will be lucky to knock out around the 240yds.
The really funny bit is that they have created it to look so linear: As you get better you some how suddenly hit it further and as you get older no matter if you get stronger/fitter or not you suddenly get shorter.
So, if that is not the case, why does the regular Tour and the Seniors Tour not play the same courses ?
I have certainly dropped 5 mph in swing speed in the last 10 years, for whatever reason. Injuries, age, fitness, confidence, whatever.
I do know some very big hitting choppers though. Seriously long, who buck the trend game golf are putting out.
I have gained about 5 mph with the driver in the last few years.
I am older, and more decrepit. I also dont practice anymore. Or play as much golf. I am also way fatter and much less fit than before. All of which add up!
I think the big thing with these results is that they are not very scientific.
The only way something like this could ever be accurate is if they did real testing in a controlled environment. Basically 10 golfers from every category they have listed and get them to play the same course for 3 days in a row. Measure every shot with a driver and see what the results are and use that as the result. This would at least take into account the day when a player has a great driving day, but also the day where we can't hit it to save our life.
All an article like this shows is that golfers will argue about anything on this forum, even when the evidence that has been presented is obviously inaccurate.
I'm confused. Isn't that what game golf effectively does? Not your specific example, but measuring every single shot.
You don't need a controlled environment to see a general trend.
I don't think handicap is related to distance, I've seen so many examples of of older guys who don't hit the ball any distance at all yet are consistent and have razor sharp short games. There was a guy at my club who played off scratch or better for over 40 years (and well into his 60's) yet I could drive the ball miles past him.
If you remember that the article gets its information from Game Golf, therefore every shot has been measured by GPS, and the data used has only been collected by the people who use Game Golf, so for users of Game Golf the evidence I would suggest is completely accurate, and as such only relates to users of Game Golf.I think the big thing with these results is that they are not very scientific.
The only way something like this could ever be accurate is if they did real testing in a controlled environment. Basically 10 golfers from every category they have listed and get them to play the same course for 3 days in a row. Measure every shot with a driver and see what the results are and use that as the result. This would at least take into account the day when a player has a great driving day, but also the day where we can't hit it to save our life.
All an article like this shows is that golfers will argue about anything on this forum, even when the evidence that has been presented is obviously inaccurate.