Imurg
The Grinder Of Pars (Semi Crocked)
Agreed. But do you not abide by that section too?
Agreed. But do you not abide by that section too?
Not how I read it at all, I would say they compliment each other, in that you should let a group through if you have lost the pace, but also if a group behind is playing quicker.The answer is simple: Page 27 Rules of Golf. Pace of Play:
'It is a group's responsibility to keep up with the group in front.If it losess a clear hole and it is delaying the group behind it should invite the group behind to play through, irrespective of the number of players in that group'
We played behind a 5 ball last month ex captain ane were held up for 12 holes.Need I say more. The comment that the group cannot go anywhere is irrelevant.
But a little further on under Priority on the course it states "Unless otherwise determined by the committee, priority on the course is determined by a groups pace of play".
I read that as if your playing quicker than the group in front, you have priority and they should let you play through.
So straight from the rules book these two pearls of wisdom contradict each other.
Why is it common sense? Surely common sense is that if you let him through [under the rules] so should the group ahead. You seem to have assumed that you let him through and he then gets stuck, admittedly as many golfers have this attitude then you're probably correct, doesn't mean that it is the correct thing to do.After a hole, I suggested that perhaps we ought to let him thru, but one of our group said 'what's the point ? He's only gonna have to wait on every shot for the group ahead, and just delay us even more', which in reality is quite right in that situation, so its tough cookies.
On any other day at my own course, and with clear holes ahead, sure anyone can come thru if they are quicker, but a sole player shouldnt automatic rights to expect to 'play thru' whatever the situation.
Common sense really ?
Even if the fast group has caught you up, the time it takes for them to play through, means that everyone else behind will now also have to wait, and it just makes the problem worse, becasue now more people are backed up.
Allowing one person to play through at the expense of the rest of the people behind is wrong in my opinion.
Another unwriten rule at my club is that you dont play a single during the day at weekends and during the week if its busy, no problem if its very quiet.
If you have a problem with that then im sorry youll have to report me, dont give a [****], and if your a single youll still have to wait.
Sounds like a two bit club anyway with members that have type of attitude.
Sounds like a two bit club anyway with members that have type of attitude.
I know it, it's quite close to me.
possibly the dearest both to join and to play in the area
I posted this the other day - can't find it now but its in the ettiqutte section of the rules:-
Pace of Play
Play at Good Pace and Keep Up
Players should play at a good pace.The Committee may establish pace of play guidelines that all players should follow.
It is a group’s responsibility to keep up with the group in front. If it loses a clear hole and it is delaying the group behind, it should invite the group behind to play through, irrespective of the number of players in that group. Where a group has not lost a clear hole, but it is apparent that the group behind can play faster, it should invite the faster moving group to play through.
So, in essence, if you have lost a hole on the group in front you should invite groups behind you to play through. You should also invite them through if you are playing slower but have not lost a hole. Its all very simple and is there in black and white in the rule book. If you're going to stick to the rules then you need to abide by these as well.
Frankly I cannmot see how anyone can argue with this at all, but as I said earlier, it's the middle lane hogger mentalityThis has been posted twice now in the space of a few days. Before reading it, I was ignorant of it, and thus was in agreement with the idea of not letting a faster group through if there is a general hold up.
But it's there in black and white.
For all those who have read it, and would still ignore it - shame on you !.
You consider yourselves to be golfers, and would strictly play to the rules, but as far as etiquette goes, well blow it if it doesn't fit in with my selfish attitude ? I'm gobsmacked
( See, I told you I was )
As for how you can tell who's quicker. Well how about working on the idea that a 2 ball is quicker than a 3 or 4 ball for starters, but probably not quicker than a solo, or another 2 ball.
Don't worry about whether the next group in front will or will not follow the rules/etiquette after you. Just do what's right and proper.
Of course, on comp / society days the commitee may want to instigate a local rule, which states differently. But until then.......