SwingsitlikeHogan
Major Champion
Put this as simple as I can. Two area of young trees both separately defined by stakes - areas are close together - maybe 2m separating the. Ball in one plantation. Nearest point of relief (say 3yds from ball) from that finds your swing being interfered with by trees in second plantation. I'm thinking you find nearest PoR from 1st plantation and drop - ignoring the second plantation - taking relief as if it did not exist. Having completed taking relief that relief situation is over. You than take relief from 2nd plantation as if that was your starting point.
That seems logical. However only question is that having taken relief from 2nd plantation you could be a long way from your original position in the 1st plantation. Say 10yds. But going back to position in 1st plantation there could be a point of relief that is only 5 yds from ball - and where the 2nd plantation does not interfere. Does that make any difference. I think not as relief is on a case by case basis - you wouldn't combine separate relief situations. But just checking.
That seems logical. However only question is that having taken relief from 2nd plantation you could be a long way from your original position in the 1st plantation. Say 10yds. But going back to position in 1st plantation there could be a point of relief that is only 5 yds from ball - and where the 2nd plantation does not interfere. Does that make any difference. I think not as relief is on a case by case basis - you wouldn't combine separate relief situations. But just checking.