Do 3/4 handicap comps favour good golfers too much?

Here are the results of board comps at my place last year, S = Stableford, M = Medal and then handicap.

A pretty fair spread if you ask me.

s 13
m 16
m 0
m 18
m 17
m 13
s 10
s 0
m 27

Only one of those is a truly high handicap and the average is 12.66 which is much lower than the average handicap.
 
Here are the results of board comps at my place last year, S = Stableford, M = Medal and then handicap.

A pretty fair spread if you ask me.

s 13
m 16
m 0
m 18
m 17
m 13
s 10
s 0
m 27

What on earth is fair about these results? Would I be right in thinking that the two wins by a scr player were the same person?

9 competitions and only 2 of them won by a single figure player.
 
Back to the stroke play should be full handicap argument. It should be. Then what is, is. There is no arguement for more or less shots that is valid. That's what a handicap is for. It just is.

Wrong? Right? It just is.
 
And? The average golfer is a high handicapper, it would be a skewed system if a disproportionate number of low handicappers won...

Disagree, the average handicap in a club environment is somewhere around mid teens, which isn't a 'high' handicap.

And if you took out the Seniors who tend not to play in competitions on a regular basis, that figure probably comes down even further.
 
Golf is a sport and it has always been my understanding in sport that the better player/team should win almost all the time. That is why sportsmen practice and train, to get better and increase their chances of winning.

Pretty simple concept to me!

But isn't the whole point of a golf handicap being that I can (off 18) compete on a level playing field with Rory McIlroy or any other top golfer. Why should this be skewed in favour of the lower handicapper by taking shots off me and not them?
 
But isn't the whole point of a golf handicap being that I can (off 18) compete on a level playing field with Rory McIlroy or any other top golfer. Why should this be skewed in favour of the lower handicapper by taking shots off me and not them?

Because as you improve at golf so does your perception that you should win more often which just isn't the case in golf, no matter how people want to distort it.
 
What on earth is fair about these results? Would I be right in thinking that the two wins by a scr player were the same person?

9 competitions and only 2 of them won by a single figure player.

Correct, it was the same player.
Just did a very quick scan from How-Did-I-Do.
At my club we have 33 single figure players out of a male membership of 495, that's 6.6%
2 wins from 9 for single figure players = 22.2%

You're right, what on earth is fair about those results?
 
To all you high handicappers......get off your lazy arses and start practicing ;)

:rofl:


Yep I am with you here, if you need more than say 15 shots then you should not be allowed out on the course.

Get to the practise area and don't come back until you can play the game, stop holding us guys up. In fact join the girls and play in their competitions:rofl::rofl:
 
Last edited:
Because as you improve at golf so does your perception that you should win more often which just isn't the case in golf, no matter how people want to distort it.

So as you improve you should accept that you basically have no chance of winning,yet higher handicappers should be capable of scoring 50 Stableford points and nett 60's ?
Have you tried reading your own posts ?
 
So as you improve you should accept that you basically have no chance of winning,yet higher handicappers should be capable of scoring 50 Stableford points and nett 60's ?
Have you tried reading your own posts ?

What are you talking about? Lower handicaps (14 and below for men) win more often on average across all the different formats of the game.

It seems you haven't read my posts!

With a better handicap comes better consistency and more chance of winning.
 
What are you talking about? Lower handicaps (14 and below for men) win more often on average across all the different formats of the game.

It seems you haven't read my posts!

With a better handicap comes better consistency and more chance of winning.

Evidence ?
Please show us the figures that show that low handicappers win more Stableford comps than higher handicappers.
 
What are you talking about? Lower handicaps (14 and below for men) win more often on average across all the different formats of the game.

It seems you haven't read my posts!

With a better handicap comes better consistency and more chance of winning.

Well put the time in and maybe just maybe you will get a decent handicap..........
 
Well put the time in and maybe just maybe you will get a decent handicap..........

I hope this is said in jest as just because you are a high h/c it doesnt mean you don't practice.

I practice and play just as much as a single figure golfer but i bet i ain't been playing nowhere near as long hence my higher h/c.
 
I hope this is said in jest as just because you are a high h/c it doesnt mean you don't practice.

I practice and play just as much as a single figure golfer but i bet i ain't been playing nowhere near as long hence my higher h/c.

If it was a snide comment, I'm letting it slide because as long as I enjoy my golf I'm happy. I know I'll lose to better players most days I play, I can live with that. Seems like the low players on here don't like the occasions they lose. :)
 
Top