Creating a ramp with a Spurk golf mat.

Many people have said yes. Has anybody said no?
I'm sure that in the previous long discussion on the matter (sorry o_O), I got to understand that you couldn't - that the mat had to be used in the way it was intended - so for instance that the spikes on the base of a Spurk were for the purpose of grip and so couldn't be used as a leveling mechanism. I may well be misremembering.
 
My original question.

Can you place the mat front lugs in the ground back lugs not in the ground to negate a slope.?
I work on a helpline as a volunteer. One common phenomenon we encounter is that callers will phone repeatedly asking the same question when the answer they got the first time was not the one they wanted to hear.

They don’t want the actual answer; they want someone to tell them they were right.

These threads are exactly like that now…
 
I'm sure that in the previous long discussion on the matter (sorry o_O), I got to understand that you couldn't - that the mat had to be used in the way it was intended - so for instance that the spikes on the base of a Spurk were for the purpose of grip and so couldn't be used as a leveling mechanism. I may well be misremembering.
Some have said they THINK that is the answer, without ever providing any documentation to back it up. And as someone pointed out, do the authorities really need to write up a big list of everything you CAN do? Of it was strictly prohibited, then you can guarantee that it will be written up somewhere. Not hidden away, and leaving thousands of golfers to guess.
 
Some have said they THINK that is the answer, without ever providing any documentation to back it up. And as someone pointed out, do the authorities really need to write up a big list of everything you CAN do? Of it was strictly prohibited, then you can guarantee that it will be written up somewhere. Not hidden away, and leaving thousands of golfers to guess.
There is obviously no categorical right or wrong here, it is open to interpretation as we suspected in the first place. Not very satisfying, but that's the only answer we're going to get. I'm sticking with my view that I would try everything to get the ball to stay on the mat before considering moving the mat to a new location - which includes tilting it slightly.
 
I'm sure that in the previous long discussion on the matter (sorry o_O), I got to understand that you couldn't - that the mat had to be used in the way it was intended - so for instance that the spikes on the base of a Spurk were for the purpose of grip and so couldn't be used as a leveling mechanism. I may well be misremembering.
Nowhere as anybody said or shown were it is stipulated all 6 spurs are to put into the ground at the same depth.

I really don’t understand the issue, it’s actually a bit of a bind to get the spurk level at times as the surface is smooth, contrast that to the plastic one pictured previously in the thread and that has an actual hollow specifically designed to hold the ball on a slope, but that is somehow OK.😵‍💫
 
There is obviously no categorical right or wrong here, it is open to interpretation as we suspected in the first place. Not very satisfying, but that's the only answer we're going to get. I'm sticking with my view that I would try everything to get the ball to stay on the mat before considering moving the mat to a new location - which includes tilting it slightly.
Is something only correct if it is written down?

I'm of the opinion that it is absolutely allowed for a fairway mat to not be perfectluy parallel to the ground, because if it wasn't, then the authorities would make it extremely clear.

There is also no rule that says the fairway mat cannot be lined up with the target, and therefore it is my belief that this is also absolutely allowed. However, if somebody started a thread "Lining up the fairway mat with the target, is it allowed?", would we have pages and pages of opinions saying yes and no, simply because there is no documents giving us a definitive answer?
 
Is something only correct if it is written down?

I'm of the opinion that it is absolutely allowed for a fairway mat to not be perfectluy parallel to the ground, because if it wasn't, then the authorities would make it extremely clear.

There is also no rule that says the fairway mat cannot be lined up with the target, and therefore it is my belief that this is also absolutely allowed. However, if somebody started a thread "Lining up the fairway mat with the target, is it allowed?", would we have pages and pages of opinions saying yes and no, simply because there is no documents giving us a definitive answer?
Lining up the mat to the target is the only logical way to have it. Why wouldn't you do that? That's the path the club would be swinging on so obviously you put it in line to the target.
 
Lining up the mat to the target is the only logical way to have it. Why wouldn't you do that? That's the path the club would be swinging on so obviously you put it in line to the target.
Indeed, very logical, isn't it? Just like flattening the mat on a slope to stop your ball rolling off?

I don't need the R&A or England Golf to confirm either of these things for me :)
 
My original question.

Can you place the mat front lugs in the ground back lugs not in the ground to negate a slope.?
Let me ask a couple questions - why are you doing that? Is it to stop the ball from rolling off the mat if you didn't do it? If so, there's already a procedure in the Local Rule to deal with that. Is it because you are creating a potential advantage for yourself? If so, that's perhaps a breach of Rule 4.3a (using equipment (other than a club or a ball) that artificially eliminates or reduces the need for a skill or judgement that is essential to the challenge of the game). Or, is there another reason for this action?
These are questions a referee would likely ask the player if he or she were called for a ruling.
 
Is something only correct if it is written down?

I'm of the opinion that it is absolutely allowed for a fairway mat to not be perfectluy parallel to the ground, because if it wasn't, then the authorities would make it extremely clear.

There is also no rule that says the fairway mat cannot be lined up with the target, and therefore it is my belief that this is also absolutely allowed. However, if somebody started a thread "Lining up the fairway mat with the target, is it allowed?", would we have pages and pages of opinions saying yes and no, simply because there is no documents giving us a definitive answer?
I actually think you may be in more trouble if you did make a point of adjusting your mat for alignment because there is a rule specifically stopping you from doing that with objects.

Setting down object to help with aiming, taking stance or swinging
You must not set an object down to help with aiming or to help in taking a stance for the stroke to be made (such as a club set down on the ground to show where you should aim or position your feet).“Set an object down” means that the object is in contact with the ground and you are not touching the object.If you breach this Rule, you cannot avoid penalty by removing the object before you make your stroke.This Rule also applies to taking an action for a similar purpose, such as you putting a mark in sand or dew to help with your swing.
 
Indeed, have a look at page 4 of the EG Adverse / Extreme Weather Conditions guidance document where it shows a drawing of a fairway mat and the clubhead path, in my opinion being along the line of target.
But also note it states that “Fairway mats with alignment lines may not be used as this would be considered a training aid”. So you could use the edge of the mat to help line up your shot, but not one with a line down the middle.
 
Let me ask a couple questions - why are you doing that? Is it to stop the ball from rolling off the mat if you didn't do it? If so, there's already a procedure in the Local Rule to deal with that. Is it because you are creating a potential advantage for yourself? If so, that's perhaps a breach of Rule 4.3a (using equipment (other than a club or a ball) that artificially eliminates or reduces the need for a skill or judgement that is essential to the challenge of the game). Or, is there another reason for this action?
These are questions a referee would likely ask the player if he or she were called for a ruling.
There isn't as far as I can see a procedure in the rule to stop the ball rolling off the mat. There is a procedure of what to do if the ball rolls off the mat twice , a slightly different situation than stopping the ball from rolling in the first place.
 
Let me ask a couple questions - why are you doing that? Is it to stop the ball from rolling off the mat if you didn't do it? If so, there's already a procedure in the Local Rule to deal with that. Is it because you are creating a potential advantage for yourself? If so, that's perhaps a breach of Rule 4.3a (using equipment (other than a club or a ball) that artificially eliminates or reduces the need for a skill or judgement that is essential to the challenge of the game). Or, is there another reason for this action?
These are questions a referee would likely ask the player if he or she were called for a ruling.
Well although you don’t really say “no you can’t do it”

That to me means No !
 
Top