Creating a ramp with a Spurk golf mat.

There is no mention of how he mat is to be placed in the local rule to keep the ball on it.

I believe that is on purpose as there are many different varities of mat and it would be impossible for the local rule to cover them all.
But the Local Rule does outline what to do if the ball won't stay on the mat and it seems very straight-forward.
"If a ball when placed rolls off the mat, the player must try to place it a second time. If the ball again does not stay on the mat, the mat must be moved to the nearest spot, not nearer the hole, where the ball will come to rest on the mat when placed."
 
But the Local Rule does outline what to do if the ball won't stay on the mat and it seems very straight-forward.
"If a ball when placed rolls off the mat, the player must try to place it a second time. If the ball again does not stay on the mat, the mat must be moved to the nearest spot, not nearer the hole, where the ball will come to rest on the mat when placed."
So the nearest spot might be exactly where it is now, as long as you leave one corner of it not quite affixed in the ground. So, fine to do that?
 
But the Local Rule does outline what to do if the ball won't stay on the mat and it seems very straight-forward.
"If a ball when placed rolls off the mat, the player must try to place it a second time. If the ball again does not stay on the mat, the mat must be moved to the nearest spot, not nearer the hole, where the ball will come to rest on the mat when placed."
And I agree, that is straightforward, but as I said before there are many variations of mats that can be used and will respind differently to differing slopes.
 
Why would you it that way? (See woofers post above)
All it says is position the mat as close to the original lie of the ball as possible, where the ball will not fall off it. So my priority would be to do just that - have it as close as possible to where the ball actually was. It does not say the mat has to perfectly match the slope of the ground beneath it.
 
All it says is position the mat as close to the original lie of the ball as possible, where the ball will not fall off it. So my priority would be to do just that - have it as close as possible to where the ball actually was. It does not say the mat has to perfectly match the slope of the ground beneath it.
Any intent to gain an advantage by doing so?
 
Does anyone think Rule 4.3a Allowed and Prohibited Uses of Equipment, (must not use equipment to create a potential advantage), might be relevant to this discussion?

Surely just using a mat in the first instance creates a potential advantage. There are lots of areas on our fairways where there is no grass within 6" of where it lies.
 
Any intent to gain an advantage by doing so?
Surely the only intent is to protect the course?

Using the mat as directed is then to place the ball on it as near as the ball has come to rest.

If then you are suggesti g people should move the ball to the side the course off the fairways will take a battering and goes against the whole point of protecting the course.

Surely the use of mats gives everybody a level playing field, each type of mat has its own advantage and I genuinely believe people are looking for answer to a problem that doesn’t exist.
 
Top