Hfuhruhurr
New member
Hi All,
I am a member at Saunton Golf Club which is fortunate enough to have 2 links golf courses, East and West. The East is traditionally known as the Championship course and has held many prestigious tournaments, not least the recent British Boys which was played over the East course. Both courses have been assessed for relative course indexes but to me they don’t make any sense. The back tees on the West course measures 6596 yards and has been given a course index of 140. The East (Championship) course from back tees measures 6774 yards but has only been given a course index of 127 ? To highlight this discrepancy further, the West yellow tees (front tees played on by many of our retired members) measures 5813 yards and has been given a course index of 132, which as you can see rates it harder than our Championship course from the back tees.
I appreciate that course comparison is sometimes difficult, but in this case the two golf courses are adjoining on similar pieces of land and are rated fairly similar in difficulty by the members, so this new rating calculation has many of us scratching our heads. Did the same person(s) evaluate both courses ? See below for a general breakdown.
Course Distance Course index
East Blue 6774 yds 127
East Yellow 5708 116
West Blue 6596 140
West Yellow 5813 132
A recent ranking by Golf World described the West course as ‘less punishing’ than the East.
I understand that the club management appealed to England Golf against the indexes but this was refused without any re-assessment. I can understand the benefits of the new system by unifying global handicap systems to enable the level playing field for players of different abilities, but this will only hold true if the course indexes are seen to be correctly evaluated.
Do other members have similar frustrations with this calculation for their courses ? Were they able to get any form of re-evaluation ?
I am a member at Saunton Golf Club which is fortunate enough to have 2 links golf courses, East and West. The East is traditionally known as the Championship course and has held many prestigious tournaments, not least the recent British Boys which was played over the East course. Both courses have been assessed for relative course indexes but to me they don’t make any sense. The back tees on the West course measures 6596 yards and has been given a course index of 140. The East (Championship) course from back tees measures 6774 yards but has only been given a course index of 127 ? To highlight this discrepancy further, the West yellow tees (front tees played on by many of our retired members) measures 5813 yards and has been given a course index of 132, which as you can see rates it harder than our Championship course from the back tees.
I appreciate that course comparison is sometimes difficult, but in this case the two golf courses are adjoining on similar pieces of land and are rated fairly similar in difficulty by the members, so this new rating calculation has many of us scratching our heads. Did the same person(s) evaluate both courses ? See below for a general breakdown.
Course Distance Course index
East Blue 6774 yds 127
East Yellow 5708 116
West Blue 6596 140
West Yellow 5813 132
A recent ranking by Golf World described the West course as ‘less punishing’ than the East.
I understand that the club management appealed to England Golf against the indexes but this was refused without any re-assessment. I can understand the benefits of the new system by unifying global handicap systems to enable the level playing field for players of different abilities, but this will only hold true if the course indexes are seen to be correctly evaluated.
Do other members have similar frustrations with this calculation for their courses ? Were they able to get any form of re-evaluation ?