Hacker Khan
Yurt Dwelling, Yoghurt Knitter
What I did see at school were 2 groups of people, there were those who excelled in the classroom (not much coursework in my day) but crumbled when it came to exams and also those who just could not get on with the day to day of school work but give them a subject and a few weeks notice and they could get through pretty much any exam (I was more of the latter). That is what estimated grades cannot take into account. The inability of one to handle the pressure of the exam room will remain hidden until later in life whereas the the ability of the other to produce a last minute spurt to achieve a goal will not be taken into account. There is no fair way of addressing this.
Literally no one (unions, Labour, teachers, universities etc) were calling for just estimated grades to be used 2 weeks ago. Everyone knew it is/was an imperfect solution with significant challenges. But at the same time it was also clear that using the algorithms would lead to situations where kids would be treated 'unfairly' due to the use of big data algorithms using large scale past performance data. That is fine if used to look at the whole as one (hence all the initial guff about the grades staying the same year on year) but falls down when dealing with individuals who are unfairly treated. And without getting too political (god forbid
Last edited: