rudebhoy
Q-School Graduate
I prefer to consider it a change of mind after considering an alternative view. Would it be better if they stuck solidly to their opinion and completely ignored other viewpoints, they would get a media pasting for doing that so its a rather 'no win' situation out there. I dont know about you but during my career I changed policy at times after someone explained a different viewpoint or technicality. As someone has suggested, politicians are not normally the expert in the subject matter, much of it is very complex or has implications that are very technical, social or ecconomic that they have to rely on the expert civil servants and advisors for direction. OK, I accept some things look straight forward but they can have deeper implications.
Changing your mind in light of new information is fine, however dismissing the key functionality the app was due to deliver as 'the cherry on the cake' simply because you don't know how to deliver it is disingenuous in the extreme and is treating your customer (the British public) like idiots.

