Coronavirus - how is it/has it affected you?
- Thread starter drdel
- Start date
Forget the dog argument, that’s been exhausted but surely we need to discuss this!
You think people should lose their human rights the moment they break the law? Who decides they’re breaking the law? The police? An impartial observer?
Methinks your suggestion is made in good faith but would purely be the act of a tyrannical nation. It’s the sort of thing you hear about in despicable countries like Saudi Arabia!
You think people should lose their human rights the moment they break the law? Who decides they’re breaking the law? The police? An impartial observer?
Methinks your suggestion is made in good faith but would purely be the act of a tyrannical nation. It’s the sort of thing you hear about in despicable countries like Saudi Arabia!
Oxford University breakthrough on global COVID-19 vaccine | University of Oxford
Whilst disappointing at 70%(or the slightly weird reading 90% result), one of the most important factors is the number of severe cases with vaccine, who cares if the 30% all end up with say like a cold or perhaps worse(just trying to be positive) and it says :-
So a great result and great news in the main, quicker to hit our shores . Feeling upbeat
Whilst disappointing at 70%(or the slightly weird reading 90% result), one of the most important factors is the number of severe cases with vaccine, who cares if the 30% all end up with say like a cold or perhaps worse(just trying to be positive) and it says :-
So a great result and great news in the main, quicker to hit our shores . Feeling upbeat
I never mentioned HUMAN RIGHTS. You have made that up!
I said suspended while in the act of a crime.
Far to many criminals end up better off than their victims once our soft courts have “ dealt with them”
I said suspended while in the act of a crime.
Far to many criminals end up better off than their victims once our soft courts have “ dealt with them”
#
So youre suggesting I can batter and mame shoplifters, even kill I guess.
So youre suggesting I can batter and mame shoplifters, even kill I guess.
What rights were you talking about if not their human rights?
And you haven’t answered a crucial question - who decides in the heat of the moment what is a crime? There’s a reason we have a justice system and what you’re suggesting would mean suspending that justice system in favour of vigilantism.
And you haven’t answered a crucial question - who decides in the heat of the moment what is a crime? There’s a reason we have a justice system and what you’re suggesting would mean suspending that justice system in favour of vigilantism.
Last edited by a moderator:
I think you are confusing some little s Croat of a burglar with a refugee or oppressed minority in a tyrannical country ,
The police decide in this country if you are committing a crime.
They tell you what law they are arresting you under when they read you your rights.
Human rights obviously mean different things to you .
Is it in your “human rights “ to be able to sue a firm because you fell through their roof while trying to break in?
The Human Rights card played again for a minor crime diminishes it.
What about the VICTIMS RIGHTS.
The police decide in this country if you are committing a crime.
They tell you what law they are arresting you under when they read you your rights.
Human rights obviously mean different things to you .
Is it in your “human rights “ to be able to sue a firm because you fell through their roof while trying to break in?
The Human Rights card played again for a minor crime diminishes it.
What about the VICTIMS RIGHTS.
Actually no - the police arrest you because you are suspected of committing a crime, guilt is not a given. Your premise falls apart at the first step.
So are you advocating that the police should be given the power to determine guilt and subvert the court system?
So are you advocating that the police should be given the power to determine guilt and subvert the court system?
It’s hard to discuss something with you as you just make your own assumptions.
Show me where I said anyone was Guilty.
Show me where I said anyone was Guilty.
That's 5 years in an iso cube perp.
Who successfully sued some one for falling through the roof during a burglary?
I know threads evolve, but this has what to do with Coronavirus? Don't suppose you could take this one elsewhere so I can ignore it easier?
There have been a few.
Do remember a young boy got a lot of money once for life changing injuries.
Sued the building owners he was burgling.
Do remember a young boy got a lot of money once for life changing injuries.
Sued the building owners he was burgling.
Okay ...back on track please, this is the
Coronavirus - how is it/has it affected you?
thread.
Lets keep it on track.
Coronavirus - how is it/has it affected you?
thread.
Lets keep it on track.
No i dont.
If a burglar successfully sued someone for their injuries then it means that a court of law has deemed that a law was broken.
I thought you were all about laws being obeyed so surely it’s right that there is a payout of a court has determined that?
I thought you were all about laws being obeyed so surely it’s right that there is a payout of a court has determined that?
The police arrest you in the act of committing a crime.
They then have to prove that in court.
You still havnt showed me where I said anyone was GUILTY.,!
You asked “in the heat of the moment who decides what is a crime?“ who do you think decides ?
For me it’s the Police.
They then have to prove that in court.
You still havnt showed me where I said anyone was GUILTY.,!
You asked “in the heat of the moment who decides what is a crime?“ who do you think decides ?
For me it’s the Police.
- Joined
- Nov 19, 2018
- Messages
- 1,547
Well said. It always mystifies me the way that the do gooders criticise those that protect them.
Takes me back to when I was a kid watching cowboy films. The town is terrorised by the baddies. No one will stand up to them.
Then along comes the good guy who is prepared to deal with them in the only way there is to stop them.
Next thing you know, he is accused of being violent and a nasty person etc etc.
The "sheep" on here who want to recruit other sheep to protect us from the wolves.
Don't want those nasty men with their dogs🙄
Takes me back to when I was a kid watching cowboy films. The town is terrorised by the baddies. No one will stand up to them.
Then along comes the good guy who is prepared to deal with them in the only way there is to stop them.
Next thing you know, he is accused of being violent and a nasty person etc etc.
The "sheep" on here who want to recruit other sheep to protect us from the wolves.
Don't want those nasty men with their dogs🙄
In the act of a CRIME he should have no right to sue anybody if he hurts himself.
The firm were deemed guilty because the building was in a poor state of repair.
But argued he should not be on it.
But as the law stands the criminal has more rights than the victims.
The firm were deemed guilty because the building was in a poor state of repair.
But argued he should not be on it.
But as the law stands the criminal has more rights than the victims.