Callaway Elyte driver

[chico]

For drivers I hear you - although what the top of the crown looks like is probably more important than what the sole looks like, since you'll see that part at address.

My point is more like, "I'll take the pretty club that is 20yds shorter than that ugly beast"

 

[Orikoru]

My point is more like, "I'll take the pretty club that is 20yds shorter than that ugly beast"

I agree, just saying the top of it can have some effect if it inspires confidence or not. The sole, as you say, no impact whatsoever.

 

[Dunesman]

At no time does he say there is anything majorly wrong with the Elyte.

It must have ended up on the cutting room floor, but his summary text below the video, conceeding others might not agree, does nevertheless state his own view explicitly :

"there is something majorly wrong with the new 2025 Callaway driver for 2025 and I think you may agree with me? or will you?"

 

[VVega]

My lad has just been fitted for one. He says the feel is amazing.

It’s as amazing as a SC or Ping or any other putter that fits you and floats your boat.

 

[VVega]

Why’s that then?
A forged iron feels different to a cast head so it is possible that the feel off one driver could be different to another.

Multiple studies attribute the “feel” of the golf club to the sound it makes. One of the peculiarities of human perception.

 

[nickjdavis]

It must have ended up on the cutting room floor, but his summary text below the video, conceeding others might not agree, does nevertheless state his own view explicitly :

"there is something majorly wrong with the new 2025 Callaway driver for 2025 and I think you may agree with me? or will you?"

...and if you watch the video it is simply that the new triangularish shape might not be to everybody's taste....he says in the video that it might put off existing Callaway buyers but on the other hand it may attract new buyers.

Why would something significantly wrong with the club end up on the cutting room floor? Do you really think that Callaway would allow such a claim of "majorly wrong" to remain in the public domain without it being explained/clarified as to exactly what is meant?

Its a bit like me saying I think my next door neighbour might be a criminal but not saying what I think he has done wrong.