D
Deleted member 16999
Guest
It also states there won’t be a sudden stop before a deal, what’s the PM saying about 31st Oct?
Brexit - or Article 50: the Phoenix!
- Thread starter drdel
- Start date
- Status
clubchamp98
Journeyman Pro
It didn’t say deal either.
It was in or out!
You say you voted leave but don’t want a no deal.
I voted leave but I would like a vote on no deal.
Why won’t MPs let us have a vote on no deal as they want it off the table before a GE.
Why should they deprive me of a vote on no deal.?
Fade and Die
Medal Winner
Not just the Attorney General was wrong, the Supreme Court has said that The Lord Chief Justice of England and Wales , The Master of the Rolls and The President of the Queen’s Bench Division, the 3 highest judges in England were all wrong!
Can’t really see how Boris is to blame with this much Silk in agreement with him.
D
Deleted member 16999
Guest
It is a copy of the official Leave leaflet posted through doors.
Foxholer
Blackballed
Just to interrupt the Ping-Pong...
I believe Tashy wanted the bits of the treaty that identify the benefits to the UK of remaining in the EU to be identified+, not simply the aims of th EU!
Which proves, irrespective of right or wrong, that the decision is subjective, and not evidence based. #very surprised...
robinthehood
Hacker
No... He just repeated the words Lisbon treaty a few times.
D
Deleted member 1147
Guest
Out of interest, who appointed all of those people to their roles?
Old Skier
Tour Winner
The Queen
clubchamp98
Journeyman Pro
If these are the three highest judges in England .
How can they be so polar opposite to the eleven judges today.?
The law is supposed to be black and white but looks very grey here.
Doon frae Troon
Ryder Cup Winner
That, as I am certain you know, is only one half of the story.
The Scottish law courts judged differently and the UK Supreme court judges, all 11 of them, agreed with the Scottish judges that the government had broken the law.
The law in Scotland is different to the law in England when it comes to sovereignty. England is with Parliament, Scotland is with the people.
Foxholer
Blackballed
Read post 13698!
Note. Perhaps a little understanding of the 'Tashy language' might be required! A 'from' after 'paste' in that post might have helped!
Your serve!
Tashyboy
Please don’t ask to see my tatts 👍
Thankyou foxy ðŸ‘. But it was not just the benefits of being in, but the pitfalls of being stuck in the EU under the rules of the Lisbon treaty
Doon frae Troon
Ryder Cup Winner
Not so funny as 'I fought the Law' but still pretty good.
Foxholer
Blackballed
Wrong! That ruled that BJ's action was unlawful. Subtle, but important, difference!
Twaddle! You are confusing 'Law' and 'Claim of Rights'/Form of Government!
Foxholer
Blackballed
I seem to detect some resistance to provide those!
I'd suggest another source - Leave literature perhaps?robinthehood
Hacker
Yes and what are those pitfalls
Fade and Die
Medal Winner
But as said by others, it’s not black or white, it’s all very subjective. I believe the case hinged on the threat made by one of the QCs that if the SC doesn’t find against the government then what is to stop it being prorogued for 6 months or even a year by some future dictatorship.
Something is saying to me that it’s all playing into Boris’ hands, come the General Election he will say only he is trying to stand up for the “common man†everyone else and the establishment cannot be trusted. Outcome....Big Conservative majority. Not saying he planned it that way as I think he’s a Grade A *** but I think he will just play the cards he’s dealt.
D
Deleted member 1147
Guest
Or others could say that BJ is not letting the MPs stand up for the common man, and so they are having to go to court to stop him acting against parliament, and therefore the people.
So he can’t be trusted and a vote against him is better so another loss for the tories (after the lost seats under TM).
It’ll be interesting to see which happens.
But I agree with your BJ rating at grade AðŸ‘
Taz
Journeyman Pro
- Status
