Foxholer
Blackballed
While I agree in principle, after a transition perod, Hobbit appears to reside in one, pay tax in another and work in neither!People should only be allowed to vote in the country where they mainly reside, work and pay tax.
While I agree in principle, after a transition perod, Hobbit appears to reside in one, pay tax in another and work in neither!People should only be allowed to vote in the country where they mainly reside, work and pay tax.
The ERG Brexiteers and DUP scuppered Brexit for PM, not Remain MPs.
Please explain how ERG Brexiteers 'scuppered' Brexit (not the PM). If she'd had any sense/diplomacy, she'd have convinced them that 'her way' was the best way to achieve their (primary) objective! I agree that DUP and Remain MPs were/are the main barrier to achieving the referendum result!The ERG Brexiteers and DUP scuppered Brexit for PM, not Remain MPs.
There was never going to be any 'better' deal available! In fact, the 'deal' is not 'deal' at all - simply an exit agreement!Surely the crap deal negotiated by May has to take some of the blame for Brexit so far not happening?
Any comment on the the answer I gave you ref Leave Campaign?![]()
Re th bold bit...That was, rightly, enforced by both the High and Supreme Courts. So May had to convincent Parliament - an impossibe task!Yes, the literature you have shown does make you right on the fact that it was said there would be a deal negotiated. I had missed that , so chalk one up to you😀
However, I do not believe that it was offered that the deal would have to be approved by the HoC. The whole point of a referendum is to bypass the HoC, it being thought too important a matter to leave to just them.
So, to bring the requirement for their approval of the deal was a weak and bad move.
I'll bet TM wishes she had ensured that the Government negotiated the deal with EU and implemented the result ,without taking any notice of that shower in Westminster .
If she had held uppermost in her mind that that was the purpose of a referendum, then she wouldn't be crying now.
Regarding your first point: 'No', I had reservations but honestly didn't understand how self serving and conniving they really are.Surely you were pretty much aware of that BEFORE the current chaos!
So does that mean you'd be happy to have a 2nd referendum, confident that the result would be the same?
Why are you asking me that?And how do you handle NI??
Presumably because the Irish (therefore EU) border is such a contentious issue!Why are you asking me that?
Yeah but what does it have to do with me? A very random out of the blue questionPresumably because the Irish (therefore EU) border is such a contentious issue!
H'mm! I'm unconvinced they are as you describe! I believe they simply have a different opinion and are determined, and in a position, to do what they think is right!Regarding your first point: 'No', I had reservations but honestly didn't understand how self serving and conniving they really are.
...
I agree! However, I'm also inclined to believe that some sort of 'compromise' (cop-out!) will happen whereby a further referendum (hopefully with Parliament's agreement that it will be binding) will be held to 'agree the deal'! Given the complete shambles that has followed the '1st' referendum, I would not be surprised if a 'Remain' result happened!Regarding your second: Again 'No' I stand firm in the belief that the decision was made in the referendum and nothing has happened to change the outcome. No further referendum should be contemplated before the result of the first has been executed.
But rather key to establishing borders(and their control)!Yeah but what does it have to do with me? A very random out of the blue question
I can only reiterate that what many of them have done is to conive a way to thwart the outcome of the referendum. They had their opportunity to refute the referendum and to vote down article 50 being enacted. Their different opinion is self serving and conniving. If you disagree with this then that's your perogative.H'mm! I'm unconvinced they are as you describe! I believe they simply have a different opinion and are determined, and in a position, to do what they think is right!
I can only reiterate that what many of them have done is to conive a way to thwart the outcome of the referendum. They had their opportunity to refute the referendum and to vote down article 50 being enacted. Their different opinion is self serving and conniving. If you disagree with this then that's your perogative.
No, I actually agree with you. But, as you and others have stated, and I agree, they are politicians - too often nasty, slimy creatures whose sole purpose seems to be self-promotian! But that's the nature of the job! Those who have morals and are in it for 'the greater good' seem to be (s)quashed either by the machine of their party or by the press as 'not <insert left/right as appropriate> wing' enough!I can only reiterate that what many of them have done is to conive a way to thwart the outcome of the referendum. They had their opportunity to refute the referendum and to vote down article 50 being enacted. Their different opinion is self serving and conniving. If you disagree with this then that's your perogative.
Casual racist slur aside, not sure I get your point .Had a lovely chinky take away last night, three couples there. All British. One couple over from Malta where they now live. The guy works in the energy business, buying and selling energy. Anyway he has had meetings with Maltese commissioners in government etc etc. Anyway Tashyboy asked him a simple question. What's the Maltese thoughts on Brexit. He said " they are shaking there heads asking what the heck is going on in the UK". No differant than the rest of us here thinking the same. However he also said " don't think that leaving the EU will affect any trade between Malta and the U.K., nothing will change". He went onto say " don't get me wrong, Malta has very close connections with the U.K. Being part of the commonwealth, but why should it change anything, it would be foolish to, as would any country. Why would a country want to harm its trade".
Had a lovely chinky take away last night, three couples there. All British. One couple over from Malta where they now live. The guy works in the energy business, buying and selling energy. Anyway he has had meetings with Maltese commissioners in government etc etc. Anyway Tashyboy asked him a simple question. What's the Maltese thoughts on Brexit. He said " they are shaking there heads asking what the heck is going on in the UK". No differant than the rest of us here thinking the same. However he also said " don't think that leaving the EU will affect any trade between Malta and the U.K., nothing will change". He went onto say " don't get me wrong, Malta has very close connections with the U.K. Being part of the commonwealth, but why should it change anything, it would be foolish to, as would any country. Why would a country want to harm its trade".