SocketRocket
Ryder Cup Winner
Throw them in the Thames.And this time be careful who gets the keys.
Throw them in the Thames.And this time be careful who gets the keys.
And the keys ðŸ˜Throw them in the Thames.
More importantly what might this do to Hacker Khan's betting pool? 😉
Is that the same Paddy Power that were offering 8 to 1 on Leave winning the referendum?
I am not sure you can say there was no need to call the referendum. There were clearly 17.4 million reasons to call it.The Tories could end up with their last 2 leaders calling a referendum on Brexit when there was no need to do it and then managing to leave the EU without a withdrawal agreement. Despite the fact that there is no clear mandate to leave with no deal from the public and a clear desire not to do that from MPs . That's quite a legacy of incompetence there, what is it with the Tories and bloody Europe?? Good job we have a very electable opposition to capitalise on that though.....
The question is, exactly how much does it need to change?The speaker has done the right thing of denying Maybot the opportunity to bring her deal to the table again if it has not changed. I already raised this a few days ago.. In this bonkers world, People cannot change their mind on a 'non-legally binding' referendum but MPs allowed to change mind on a Meaningful vote!!
That has come to the surface for sure.I am not sure you can say there was no need to call the referendum. There were clearly 17.4 million reasons to call it.
And if you think the EU (not Europe) is only a Tory issue, you are mistaken.
It has to change without some form of bribery.. watching the DUP prance about acting important and looking enriched is disgusting and the thought of paying off MPs for votes doesn’t sound like democracy.The question is, exactly how much does it need to change?
There is no doubt in my mind Bercow is using his position with a political bias.I see the usual right wing papers are all piling in on Bercow on their front pages.
I'm assuming they are angry that he is ensuring the British parliament, that will be taking back control from the EU, functions as it is meant to do and is not rode roughshod over.
And it was all going so well anyway apart from this last minute hiccup.....
Are they? I thought they had given the responsibility for negotiating a deal to the negotiating team. And have been kept up to date with progress at times through the process....To the best of my knowledge nowt. All the leaders of the EU are supposed to agree on any changes and they have not met yet, plus they said " don't bother coming back"....
Seems he was correct though!...
What narks me was the Scotish guy on QT last week said that we should not of had the second vote as it broke Parliment law. He was either lying when he said it, or simply did not know what the ruling was. Either way it was very poor. What was worse was no one was able pull him up and say he was wrong.
There is no doubt in my mind Bercow is using his position with a political bias.
These “reporters†need to learn respect, he’s polite and yet they continue to badger him.
These “reporters†need to learn respect, he’s polite and yet they continue to badger him.
If the BBC want an interview they should request it through the proper channels, no ambush someone on the streets trying to get a scoop!
Agreed, been watching too much 'rogue traders'. Harassment from journos is perhaps justifiable with some clear evidence of criminality, not just for doing your job.
He just sounded desperate! Bercow was even more interested in the blokes welfare than he was himself.I normally stick up a lot for the BBC but this was pretty poor. He literally explained his thought process in the HOC which was broadcast for all to see and hear. it's kind of stooping down to the level of the headlines on the front pages of the Sun, Mail and Express which is never a good look really.
Wait for the next nut job to find out his route.
I would suggest he should have allowed the vote on the basis it may pass and bring an end to this matter dragging on. I suspect that he is blocking it not as a mater of procedure but as a way to frustrate Brexit and hopefully kill it off.So what should he have done when asked to clarify the position on bringing back the exact same vote?