Brexit - or Article 50: the Phoenix!

Status
Not open for further replies.
Just to ensure that the 'full story' about the vote is told..... As per the 1st link in LPP's post, Sinn Fein actually proposed the initial vote to 'oppose' it, but an amendment, subsequently passed with the Mayor's was introduced to 'condemn' it.
Isn’t that what I said? Thanks for the clarification but it wasn’t needed.
No matter how it is dressed up, Sinn Fein actually voted against condemning a terrorist attack.
It seems to me that the other parties saw right through Sinn Fein’s Proposal and showed them up for what they are. If Sinn Fein had won the vote against the amendment, if it wasn’t for the Mayor, the council would have actually voted against condemning a terrorist attack.
 
Seems you didn't absorb (or maybe even read!) the link I provided. It clearly indicates (at least, to me) the connection, therefore involvement, of the EU!

And re the bold bit...I'm sure you could too!
Don’t worry. We are all fully aware that you have googled “Good Friday Agreement”.
The EU has an interest because Ireland is an EU country as is the UK for now. Other than that, it’s all spin.
 
But, in all likelihood, would have voted to 'oppose' it.
Well, as they tabled the proposal it would be strange if they didn’t.
You seem to be defending Sinn Fein voting against condemning a terrorist act. Do you really think this is a matter of language?
 
Well, as they tabled the proposal it would be strange if they didn’t.
...
Re-read my post - and notice the important words 'the council' in the bit of YOUR post that I quoted!

...
You seem to be defending Sinn Fein voting against condemning a terrorist act. Do you really think this is a matter of language?
Not at all - though I can understand how you could take that (erroneous, I can assure you) view. Simply making certain that ALL the relevant facts are 'visible'!

In matters about Ireland, 'language' seems, to me, to be extremely (often obscenely) important to all 'sides'!
 
Re-read my post - and notice the important words 'the council' in the bit of YOUR post that I quoted!


Not at all - though I can understand how you could take that (erroneous, I can assure you) view. Simply making certain that ALL the relevant facts are 'visible'!

In matters about Ireland, 'language' seems, to me, to be extremely (often obscenely) important to all 'sides'!
ALL facts were “visible”
 
Last edited:
Check out @AgentP22’s Tweet:
Just f'Doon

Do you seriously think that the rUK government would not trade with an Independent Scotland.
How will they replace all that water/ clean electric power/food etc.

May is totally out of touch of anything north of Watford.
But hey ho you think she is a great leader:LOL:
 
Seriously? Where has anyone suggested “it’s the fault of Brexit” - for a self proclaimed intelligent bloke you certainly know how to say something stupid
You are a bit odd. In your post you mentioned Brexit and the border, are you now denying it with the mandatory insult to back it up.
 
Last edited:
Do you seriously think that the rUK government would not trade with an Independent Scotland.
How will they replace all that water/ clean electric power/food etc.

May is totally out of touch of anything north of Watford.
But hey ho you think she is a great leader:LOL:

I live in North Watford. She isn't great.
 
That’s funny, you’ve spent 2 years telling us that the EU won’t trade with an independent UK!

According to the sacremongers we don't do anything outside the EU. Funny because retailers are criticised for paying low wages to Indian workers (among
Do you seriously think that the rUK government would not trade with an Independent Scotland.
How will they replace all that water/ clean electric power/food etc.

May is totally out of touch of anything north of Watford.
But hey ho you think she is a great leader:LOL:

But Sturgeon and Corbyn are so much better!!
 
It’s not surprising a global slump, the gateway into Europe with a European derivative car. They will source around Europe for parts. They are in a mind blowingly competitive sector, consumers don’t want to pay over the odds. When the dust settles and we see what the trade deals are they will decide. Lots of car makers are pulling development budgets, looking at unnecessary spending.
The trade deal we have should not be just about cars it should be about the components, if these jobs are to be maintained.
 
Do you post anything about golf?
Err, yes, try taking a look but if theres anything you want some help with then dont be shy in asking.

What are you trying to make from that comment, silly point scoring I guess. You really need to grow up as you are making yourself look like you are incapable of discussing this subject without silly put downs. Although, as a remainer you are not alone in that respect.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top