Brexit - or Article 50: the Phoenix!

Status
Not open for further replies.
Currently, the UK still has a veto on military policy in the EU.

Although the Lisbon Treaty has changed what the qualified majority rules are, and lowered the benchmark for laws to be passed, the forming of an EU army falls outside of the Lisbon Treaty.

Whether its being done by the back door, as the EU expands its Security and Defence policy, thats open to each individual's interpretation. And whether a future UK govt, assuming Brexit doesn't happen, decides to go along with a formation of an EU army, who knows...
 
If you want confirmation of the direction the European Defence and Security policy is going have a look at YouTube. There's plenty of news clips with Merkel, Macron and Juncker advocating a European Army. 3 years ago the Commission confirmed that a new HQ was needed for the EU military HQ. 2 years ago it was opened.

The EU has been deploying troops around the world, under an EU flag and control and command structure, since 2003.

Stop it Brian, people based their votes on this crap... :rolleyes:
 
If you want confirmation of the direction the European Defence and Security policy is going have a look at YouTube. There's plenty of news clips with Merkel, Macron and Juncker advocating a European Army. 3 years ago the Commission confirmed that a new HQ was needed for the EU military HQ. 2 years ago it was opened.

The EU has been deploying troops around the world, under an EU flag and control and command structure, since 2003.

Was talking to an old colleague about the EU Army and he doesn’t see a formal one being constructed but more a collaboration in the same way Forces work together with NATO etc - especially from the UK , even if/when we do leave EU we will still work alongside them.
 
and people say leavers were thick

Like the relative of mine that voted Remain on the basis of how much money the EU give us, completely overlooking the fact that they give us back about a quarter of what we give them.

But like you say mate, it's only the Leavers that were thick.
 
Like the relative of mine that voted Remain on the basis of how much money the EU give us, completely overlooking the fact that they give us back about a quarter of what we give them.

To be honest this is why it's important that we live in a democracy.... Or whatever it is we live in today (according to the lib Dems).

People's knowledge has gaps depending on how interested they are in the subject and what their sources are.... For instance I wouldn't expect anyone that uses the BBC as their knowledge base to have a balanced view.

Also, just think that even to this day people still believe that the bus told the leavers that we'd put £350m a week into the NHS, because it fits their agenda. It honestly baffles me that the arguments are so so weak.[/QUOTE]
 
Well, its what Remainers wanted..... Federalism. Take no deal off the table, spend 3 years blocking.... that your fault mate.
I don’t know anyone that wanted federalism, that’s a silly statement.

As for the EU Army, as Woody69 has posted this isn’t likely to happen, I’m all for closer working, especially if there is money to be saved, which can go to restoring some of the cuts the Government have made in the last 10 years.
 
How many of the people who voted leave in this thread are under 45?
Most of the people parading outside Parliament, at LibDem conference and members of Momentum look like their not spring chickens. Anyhow why does it matter, are people over 45 not experienced in worldly matters and bringing life experience to the debate.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top