clubchamp98
Journeyman Pro
Great goal.
Are those the only options?
You are saying England cannot win by playing attacking football, but can win by playing boring football like when Greece won Euros?
No, absolutely. I was exaggerating the point. We will likely qualify, job done at this stage.
I just see Foden as a top talent who can unlock defences. To not use him is a criminal waste, imo, particularly in game where we were incredibly uninspiring.
Well, that is a fair point ?Maybe he can't look past the ridiculous haircut that makes him look like Stan from eminem
Well, that is a fair point ?
On a plus note, makes the last round of games more interesting. It is in the hands of all 4 teams to qualify, whilst each team can also get eliminatedOn tonight's game, massive disappointment. I was really looking forward to it but Mexico have offered nothing and argentina look disjointed.
Great for the neutral ?On a plus note, makes the last round of games more interesting. It is in the hands of all 4 teams to qualify, whilst each team can also get eliminated
It'll be interesting to see how he fits Maddison into his team, well if southgate grows himself a pair of los cajones that is.
I suspect he'll start Foden at least. He usually reacts when public reaction tells him he is making a bit of a mess of it. Probably why he put Maddison is squad at all, although I agree it is unlikely he will play himMate, Maddison won't play in this world cup.
Neither will TAA.
Expect the same starting XI against Wales.
Maddison is crocked. He's only been doing light work on his own and hasn't taken part in any sessions with the squad.
You can't start in a must win World Cup game with little or no high intensity training for over 2 weeks. He's essentially a cheerleader who will only get any minutes if we get to the semi finals or final and suffer other injuries.
Who would have gone instead of Madison realistically? I mean yes he is injured but we have a much bigger squad this time so is covered
Bowen was in but his form has been awful doesn't deserve it where as mad does .. least get him in and around the camp
Good question.
I would've taken another striker personally. I know Toney has trouble coming from the gambling issue but until he's found guilty he should've been in the squad. He offers something totally different to anyone else. The guy is a beast. His exclusion was Southgate playing politics and covering his own back, IMO.
Mate, Maddison won't play in this world cup.
Neither will TAA.
Expect the same starting XI against Wales.
Southgate was poor as Middlesbrough manager playing defensive negative football , as England U21 manager he wasn’t much better. As England manager in 2018 he set pieced his way to a semi final but lost any game when he came up against a decent side
The Euros was the best chance since 96 for England to win and again he was found wanting - he had at his disposal some of the best talent in Europe , players that star for the best managers in the world but he cannot adapt , he cant change as the game goes , and he can’t develop away from a “must not lose” mentality.
There has been lots of talk about Sven wasting the golden generation but at least there were a lot of strong nations to battle against - Southgate is going to waste a lot more and during a period where there isn’t a stand out national team.
Every single top manager would find a place for the likes of Foden , TAA , Grealish , Maddison etc - Southgate finds a way to justify keeping them sat on the bench
I think i said earlier on that Maddisonand TAA wont get a sniff.
Not using the squad will be Southgates downfall. 1st chance he gets to start Kalvin Phillips, whose played 54 mins all season, he'll take it.
Every team that have won the WC utilise their squad, not just the favourite 14.
I don't think it's so much playing politics it's more he is about to be banned I reckon the fa stepped in
He is looking at a serious ban, possible 2 years
I think Wilson is that option instead
Shame Sancho's form has dropped off a cliff
Virtually all football managers say very nice things about other football managers, so I would read nothing into what Wenger said.Was he poor? Yes at Middleborough he had a win % of 29% but he also attracted praise from one of the best managers in premier League history
In December 2007, Arsenal manager Arsène Wenger suggested Southgate as one of several English managers who were "all good enough" to manage the national team
He also that season took Middlesbrough out of the relegation zone to 13th , smashing city 8-1 on the final day . Biggest win in premier league for them
His u21 record is a win % of 73% that's not bad at all. How can that be bad? In any way shape or form. Bearing in mind the u21s often get robbed of talent if they are deemed good enough for the full team so can't always get a core group of players
His England record is 60% win rate
Euro final.. our first manager final since 1966
He may be boring but he is by no means a poor manager.
Virtually all football managers say very nice things about other football managers, so I would read nothing into what Wenger said.
Did Southgate get sacked from Middlesbrough?
Even poor managers will have good results from time to time. Doesn't make them great managers.
I've no idea what a typical win rate is for England. But, given most of their games are against poor sides, I'd almost imagine at least 50% of games should be an easy win? For example, surely even any of us on this forum could manage to get a win if we managed England versus the likes of San Marino?