rudebhoy
Q-School Graduate
driver for me, nice bit of karma at the end.
Brexiters
Well obviously the Golf as he's hit the car up the rear which is stationary. However I don't like the private policeman with the headcam. Goading the car is wrong, and I would argue is most definately a contributing factor.
However the whole "who is to blame" thing is what is wrong with modern life. Accidents happen, always have and always will. Looking for someone to blame is wrong.
It is. That's the entrance to the Garscube Estate on the left at the the start.Switchback Road?
Both are in the wrong. Self-proclaimed guardians of the roads on their bikes with head cameras which sure as hell don't get used when they go through red lights. Idiot drivers who use mobile phones. Hopefully the driver gets done, his insurance premiums go up etc. And the cyclist hits a nice pothole whilst riding on his own, goes arse over tit and loses a few teeth on the road.
I'd make a great judge.
Mobile using motorist causes his vehicle to crash into another and there's reason to apportion blame elsewhere...
Hands up anyone who hasn't lobbed some verbals at mobile using drivers....
That's too simplistic.
The story is distracted driver causes his vehicle to crash into another.
The question is how much each factor contributed to the driver's distraction. Of course the motorist was in the wrong for using his phone, but the question that will never be answered is would the collision have happened if the cyclist didn't dish out his own form of vigilante justice? Any attention that the motorist has to pay to the cyclist is further distracting from driving, so the cyclist thinking he is making the roads safer, is actually making them more dangerous. None of this excuses the driver's phone usage, but 2 wrongs don't make a right.
Instead of apportioning blame we should be learning lessons, of which 2 of them are that the driver shouldn't be using his phone, and the cyclist shouldn't engage with the driver. If the cyclist had just recorded the incident and reported it, it is possible the crash wouldn't have occurred, the driver would still have been punished - which may or may not have changed their behaviour, and the innocent third party wouldn't have to deal with the hassle of getting rear-ended.
It is. That's the entrance to the Garscube Estate on the left at the the start.
Don't ask me, I'm from South of the Border!Even as a Southsider I thought I recognised it - well what would you expect from folks north side of the river![]()