That would certainly be interesting, as would how we compare internationally.
Ire appear to be punching above its weight to the casual observer comp to Scotland. certainly appear to have more guys having results once turning pro..
That would certainly be interesting, as would how we compare internationally.
how would seeing a load of youngsters jetting a around the globe paid for by the man on the street, inspire the man on the street to take up golf?
After last year's debacle where the chief exec quit and the members rejected the proposal to double the affiliation fee to fund a number of initiatives, the latest AGM last weekend ended in acrimony with the more modest £3.75 increase rejected and the chair calling out some of the sexism and misogyny she's been subjected to in the role.
This rejection in conjunction with reduced funding from Sport Scotland means the incoming chief exec will have to spend his first few weeks and months on further cost cutting rather than on initiatives to develop and grow the game.
Seems like they also need to do a lot to win "hearts and minds" of rank and file golfers who don't appreciate the role Scottish Golf plays in the game, and maybe knocking a few dinosaur heads together as well!
Having done a bit more "research" by asking a friend in the "know" I understand that is was your home golf union that has caused the latest storm.
Personally I think it is a bitter childish rant that makes the already beleaguered organisation look even more ridiculous. The club golfer has a right to question why they fund elite golfers and get nothing back from their "investment" or "contribution".
You don't think think success inspires people to take up a sport? Success of a local doesn't inspire local golfers to play more, whatever their level?
What do you mean by my "home golf union"?
I agree about questioning how resources are used but I don't agree that the club golfer gets nothing.
nope.. !
Some might be inspired by pro's Ams no
I'm meaning at top level. Rory inspiring kids in N.Ireland, Chris Paisley inspiring people in my county following his recent win. You don't think that happens?
To get to that level most go through the amateur ranks and get helped by their counties or national bodies.
Lothians are the Union that the rant is referring to I understand.
I'm meaning at top level. Rory inspiring kids in N.Ireland, Chris Paisley inspiring people in my county following his recent win. You don't think that happens?
To get to that level most go through the amateur ranks and get helped by their counties or national bodies.
Oh right, that's nothing to do with me! Interestingly, I heard it was more down your way.... Probably both!
patricks148;18 Ireland is something we should be looking at sim sized population same amount of golfers said:Good point.
26 % on elite golfers so what happens to the other 74%, what does the average hacker like myself get out of it in my eyes nowt. Ireland have a GUI card which from my knowledge of booking times they get a decent discount on courses and not just the top ones either.
A good thing ive seen from Ireland is national club comps for handicap golfers between certain ranges we have nowt like that here
. I'm not sure where the sexism card comes from. If she has evidence to support this rant it should be put on the table and the offenders named and shamed and taken to task, there is no place for that within the game at any level.
Believe it or not I'm not here just to defend SG, clearly big changes are required, but I think this attitude is problematic. You get lots from them from handicapping to discounts, support for your club, efforts to promote and develop the game and, yes, championships. I agree they could probably do better on the latter front but have to find the right niche to pitch it at. Surely nobody would argue against them staging national scratch championships but what would you like to see for handicap golf that wouldn't just be a direct competitor for club opens etc?
karen i no you aren't defending them and if the CEO says theres been comments made she should out them ive no time for sexist nonsense. A few years ago they ran a Texas Scramble comp with winners from your home club going to a selected venue then the winning teams got a place in the Pro - Am at The Challenge tour event at Spey Valley.
The GUI run 2 comps the Jimmy Bruen Shield which is inter club comps minimum 5 handicap and max per pair is 15 and 5 pairs per team, they also run one with a higher handicap limit from what i no its very competitive .
Maybe something like that would be good to get clubs involved
They took over running the old SLGA Medals Finals. The best performer in a club's medals the previous year (both in bronze and silver divisions) gets put forward into one of four regional finals and so many from each then qualify for the grand final at the end of the year. I don't think there's similar for men but does that sound like something that would be good?
I think truly elite golfers inspire people to take up the game so that is justifiable. Where might be questioned is very good, but not truly elite, golfers getting money for coaching, advice and everything else that goes with golf now, the backroom staff can be significant. If too much money goes into the latter group then they maybe more open to criticism.
Do you think they have the balance right? I don't know about golf in Scotland in that sense.