Upskirting bill fails because of one chop!

Don't know why he did it, haven't seen him quoted anywhere. However, does it need a law specific to this? Surely we should have one that covers this under some sexual offence act?

Would the bill cover other forms of sexual offence or was it purely for upskirting? Perhaps he objected in order for the bill to be widened and cover other, equally new forms of offences? The bill may have good intentions but currently be badly worded.

I hope it is this as otherwise the man has no excuse.

In case anyone thinks otherwise I agree that anyone doing this should feel the full force of the law, it is a dreadful thing to do.
 
One suggestion is that he is trained lawyer I think, so he may think it is bad legislation and it is better to block this and come back with a better one. Or he could just be an old out of touch pervert who sees nothing wrong with the practice. I'm sure we'll find out soon.
 
Don't know why he did it, haven't seen him quoted anywhere. However, does it need a law specific to this? Surely we should have one that covers this under some sexual offence act?

Would the bill cover other forms of sexual offence or was it purely for upskirting? Perhaps he objected in order for the bill to be widened and cover other, equally new forms of offences? The bill may have good intentions but currently be badly worded.

I hope it is this as otherwise the man has no excuse.

In case anyone thinks otherwise I agree that anyone doing this should feel the full force of the law, it is a dreadful thing to do.

If you read the full article in the link it answers all your questions, which is why Scotland created a law against it, as it wasn't covered, as it's not in England.
 
Just 're read it. Think the BBC must have updated the original post as it now does answer those questions.

Seems he was quite right to object, with the intention of bringing it back in better form.
 
I did read it but don't think it did answer them. It partly answered the odd one but not clearly, hence the questions.

Really?

Q/ However, does it need a law specific to this?

A/ Yes, as Scotland realised.

Q/ Surely we should have one that covers this under some sexual offence act?

A/ No we don’t, as the article explains, hence the bill.

Q/ Would the bill cover other forms of sexual offence or was it purely for upskirting?

A/ Purely for upskirting as other areas are already covered.

Can’t see any other questions in your post?
 
Just 're read it. Think the BBC must have updated the original post as it now does answer those questions.

Seems he was quite right to object, with the intention of bringing it back in better form.

I’ve only read 1 report, hence my response.
 
One suggestion is that he is trained lawyer I think, so he may think it is bad legislation and it is better to block this and come back with a better one. Or he could just be an old out of touch pervert who sees nothing wrong with the practice. I'm sure we'll find out soon.
That’s the crux of what I’ve read, apparently there is a group of MP’s who attend the Friday session, (always poorly attended apparently....), to object to any legislation which they believe hasn’t been discussed properly, or is poorly written.

There is a thread on a hockey forum I frequent, and no-one is talking about the MP as one poster said upskirting shouldn’t be illegal as it’s just public space.....
 
Without going into his motivation, how can a single MP stop it anyway? Or is 'objecting' basically the same like a US senator talking for hours so it can't get voted on?
 
If it was successful getting into law then such as the Sun, Star, Express, Mirror and Mail would have to stop publishing pictures of ladies and Scots lads in kilts unintentionally showing more than they might wish when getting out of taxis, sitting cross legged etc - one of the staple 'whoooargh' types of photograph beloved by these papers and their readers. So maybe he opposed the legislation for protection of 'freedom of the press' reasons - maybe.
 
Has anyone on here read the actual private members bill thats been blocked? No? Thought not - l havent either ...

However it easy to understand that suggested legislation frequently a) won't achieve what it is intended to do, or b) will have unintended consequences or ç) both. The system needs the ability to address this. As far as I've read, Chope has not killed this off, but has merely ensured that it gets more proper consideration.

I know nothing about the man but he's been an MP for 20 years or so. So l doubt he would be unaware of the likely public reaction to him objecting. Yet he still did so. I find that interesting rather than reprehensible.

But then again, since when has the voice of reason ever had its day ...
 
Top