Marshy77
Journeyman Pro
Yes, I'd rather not play par 3's anymoreHappy to agree. I'd be content never to play another one. Sadly, that won't be the case![]()
Yes, I'd rather not play par 3's anymoreHappy to agree. I'd be content never to play another one. Sadly, that won't be the case![]()
Is that the one in the dip. A real blind tee shot.By some distance the most bonkers uphill par 3 I have ever played is the 14th at Bamburgh Castle.
Only 140-odd yards, but you can just about see the top of the pin from down below, and the green is tiny. Add to that the fact that all you have between tee and green is trouble and it’s a proper test
All day. Both of these are great examples of how it doesn't need to be silly long to be a challenge10th at Hillside is a beauty
4th at Sunningdale is too
Is that the one in the dip. A real blind tee shot.
Our par threes are 172, 190, 192, 198. They are all stupidly long. The 192 yard hole is down hill, pond and bunker to the left. Big drop off on the back. Quite frankly it is a lottery. They moved a tee to make it 120 over the pond. It was gorgeous. But they hardly use it.
16th CarnoustieThere is an uphill par 3 at Port Glasgow GC, can't remember which hole but if you don't hit the ball high you won't get up.
Agree that short ones are the best. Postage Stamp, 17th Sawgrass, 7th Pebble, 9th and 12th Blackmoor, 11th Hayling, 4th Suuningdale Old, 5th at Lahinch
So many good ones to choose from but you rarely hear anyone talking about great long par 3's, only one that comes to mind is Calamity at Portrush.
16 at Carnoustie is a very difficult hole indeed. With the pin up the back it must be about 260 yards.16th Carnoustie
17th Troon spring to mind immediately
Anyone who thinks long par3's can't be good lacks imagination.
what makes it good?16th Carnoustie
17th Troon spring to mind immediately
Anyone who thinks long par3's can't be good lacks imagination.
Agreed.what makes it good?
the fact it is hard, and even the best pros ever have struggled with it. The difference is it's only realy hard because of it's length.
Compare to the 12th at Augusta, only 150 yards but have to carry water, bunkers, have to hit the right part of the green, if you go long, a tricky chip that slopes back to the water.
Expecting even a single figure golfer to be able to be super accurate from over 200 yards, with enough height and spin to hold onto a green, that's not good, that's unimaginative, it's hard yes, but not a good hole. Short par 3s where you have to be even more accurate is a better test of all abilities
My big bro is a member at Muir. Must get a game.Generally not a fan, i can only think of two uphill par 3s up here. the 9th a t Fortrose, which is about 180/ 190 ish, but is usually downwind and takes 2 or 3 clubs less club. the Other is at Muir of Ord which is like a medieval Mott. only 100 yards, but very difficult to hit the green is very small, surrounded by a ditch. i think ive only ever hit the green a couple of times out of the dozens of times ive played it![]()
16 at Carnoustie is a very difficult hole indeed. With the pin up the back it must be about 260 yards.
That might be a good hole for the best players in the world and fun to watch, that doesn’t make it a good hole in my eyes.
Firstly my response was about do you hear people talking about great long par 3's and that is one you definitely hear people talking about.what makes it good?
the fact it is hard, and even the best pros ever have struggled with it. The difference is it's only realy hard because of it's length.
Compare to the 12th at Augusta, only 150 yards but have to carry water, bunkers, have to hit the right part of the green, if you go long, a tricky chip that slopes back to the water.
Expecting even a single figure golfer to be able to be super accurate from over 200 yards, with enough height and spin to hold onto a green, that's not good, that's unimaginative, it's hard yes, but not a good hole. Short par 3s where you have to be even more accurate is a better test of all abilities
but 212 yards up hill is going to be closer to 230 to hit. Very vey few handicap golfers can hit an iron 230 carry, and the ball won't roll on very easily, so taking woods, which won't stop on the green.Firstly my response was about do you hear people talking about great long par 3's and that is one you definitely hear people talking about.
Secondly there are a variety of tees down to 212 yds depending on your desires.
On a long tough par 3 I will have the option of going for the green or laying up and chipping /pitching for my par. The former might give me great satisfaction if I pull it off the latter might be the better bet depending on the state of the match / my card/ my opponents shot etc. This is the very essence of golf.
Most golf courses have around four par 3 holes , there should be variety amongst them and that variety should IMHO include distance having one of them as a long tough par 3 which can bring huge satisfaction if I go for it and pull it off , a different form of satisfaction if I lay up and chip and putt for my par and the possibility of disaster is part of what a golf course should be about.
I am certainly not criticising short par3's there are many enjoyable ones but there are also many good long ones my perfect golf course would have both.
Speaking as a short hitter I would far rather have a long par 3 to give me interest than a 600 yd par 5 on lush grass which is basically a slog, I can negotiate the longest half decent par 3 with a bit of cunning a long par 5 is just interminable.