HawkeyeMS
Ryder Cup Winner
The R&A and USGA are still looking into the situation but are wary that longer putters can help recreational players stay interested in the game while a ban might also affect the equipment companies.
The only reason, IMHO of course, that people who go to the long putter are better at putting with it is because it forces them to practice. How many people do you know that moan they can't putt and then spend zero time practicing putting. They go and buy a new Scotty and they still can't putt so they claim Scotty's are no good - but they still haven't practiced putting.
When you go to the long putter you have to practice because it is different, you have no choice but to practice so you improve. If these people put as much time into practicing with their old standard putter they would probably see an mprovement and save themselves some money.
If you practice a lot with a standard putter and you still can't do it you have to accept it. When I was a kid I wanted to be a footballer, I played to a decent standard at youth level but at the end of the day I wasn't good enough to make any money out of it.
If Adam Scott or any of the other top players can't putt well enough to compete for the top honours then so be it - tough, there will always be someone else who has a more complete game to take his place.
Anchoring the putter fundamentally changes the the stroke and that is what is wrong in my opinion.
What if it isn't putting that is your problem? Take Homer for example, he is having a bit of a mare with his chipping which is holding him back. The rest of his game is fine and good enoug to be at least a couple of shots lower, but he can't chip. Maybe Homer should invent some wedges he can anchor to his stomach to take some of the movmement out of his chipping action so he can get a better strike? But poor old Homer can't do that, he has to go and practice and pay for lessons to improve. I don't see why putting should be any different.