D
Deleted Member 1156
Guest
People have braked sharply whilst I have been on the motorway texting, but as I have previously mentioned my eyes are not off the road for more than it takes to complete a number of other activities that make me take my eyes off the road, so I am able to react. Would I react quicker if my eyes had been 100% focused on the road ahead, of course, but that isn't the point I am trying to make.
Doing anything other than focusing 100% on the road ahead whilst driving could be considered stupid, careless and dangerous. Again, I'm not arguing against that. It is a risk, of course it is.
As for the article it's fairly meaningless. Texting causes more teen deaths than drink drivers? I'd imagine the key bit of information there considering it is talking about the US is there are a much higher number of teenagers who have a phone and text versus those who drink. If a million people text and 3000 are involved in accidents, versus 100k drinking and 2500 involved in drink driving related deaths, you could suggest texting whilst driving is much more safer than driving drunk. It's a fairly pointless comparison. I'm not disputing texting may be the cause of an accident if done in a reckless way, i.e. texting looking at the phone for an extended period of time, not looking up. The kid who died in that article texting had drifted into a different lane. I have never even come close to drifting because I don't look at the screen of my phone for long enough.
Finally, I don't make decisions based solely on if I can live with the consequences. If that was the case I wouldn't even get in a car. I make a personal assessment based on what I believe the overall risk of something happening against the possible consequences.
I'm sure all those people that have caused fatal accidents due to using their phones made those same informed decisions as you