NeilTappin
GM Staff
Morning all,
We've just uploaded a story about the new TaylorMade Burner 2.0 irons http://www.golf-monthly.co.uk/tours-and-...-2-0-irons.html
We will have more pictures coming this afternoon with a comprehensive gallery.
As an aside, I was involved in a conference call with Mark King (CEO of TMAG) on Wednesday. It is exactly 10 years since they re-launched the brand as a decade ago they were at risk of drifting towards obscurity. It was then that they decided to focus on becoming the number one metal wood company and improve their coverage on Tour. The success they had in this area allowed them to invest and improve their offerings in all categories. They are now a very big player indeed.
Interestingly, Mark had to field quite a lot of questions about the short product life-cycles that TalorMade has been criticised for. He said that this was inevitable as the technology and manufacturing processes improved. He said that to remain number one in different categories they have to regularly release new products that gradually evolve the technology, even if these steps in improvement are relatively small. This isn't going to change. He also mentioned that there are a significant number of people that look to invest in new equipment each year. To ensure TaylorMade always remain current, they have to release regularly. Revolutionary products come round once every four or five years and in between time, they tweak these products to make them better.
Just thought I'd would mention this as I know that TaylorMade has received plenty of criticism for their high frequency of product turnover on our forum. Any thoughts?
We've just uploaded a story about the new TaylorMade Burner 2.0 irons http://www.golf-monthly.co.uk/tours-and-...-2-0-irons.html
We will have more pictures coming this afternoon with a comprehensive gallery.
As an aside, I was involved in a conference call with Mark King (CEO of TMAG) on Wednesday. It is exactly 10 years since they re-launched the brand as a decade ago they were at risk of drifting towards obscurity. It was then that they decided to focus on becoming the number one metal wood company and improve their coverage on Tour. The success they had in this area allowed them to invest and improve their offerings in all categories. They are now a very big player indeed.
Interestingly, Mark had to field quite a lot of questions about the short product life-cycles that TalorMade has been criticised for. He said that this was inevitable as the technology and manufacturing processes improved. He said that to remain number one in different categories they have to regularly release new products that gradually evolve the technology, even if these steps in improvement are relatively small. This isn't going to change. He also mentioned that there are a significant number of people that look to invest in new equipment each year. To ensure TaylorMade always remain current, they have to release regularly. Revolutionary products come round once every four or five years and in between time, they tweak these products to make them better.
Just thought I'd would mention this as I know that TaylorMade has received plenty of criticism for their high frequency of product turnover on our forum. Any thoughts?