Bash
Assistant Pro
Hope this doesn't send you guys (and gals) too sleep but my playing partner in our winter league suggested I would benefit from a lighter iron (currently using Callaway X22s). He suggested giving the Cleveland CG16s a go and recommended the Cleveland Centre of excellence at Maidenhead for fitting.
I looked at the relevant websites and saw that the swingweight of CG16s is D3 (9 iron to 3 iron), whereas the swingweight of the X22s is lighter at D0, despite the claim of Cleveland that their shafts are so much lighter than the competition.
When I pointed this out to the Centre of excellence and suggested I would try the CG16s (together with Mizuno JPX800 and MP53s (and my own X22) before deciding whether I would go to them for a fitting on the CG16s, they responded with the following:-
"A s/w point equates to approximately 1.8g so there may be a negligible difference between the CG16 and X22. The CG 16 is light in total weight - both shaft and grip are lighter than most competitor standards. As a result the s/w has to increase to maintain head speed among other engineering considerations"
As a result I did a bit of googling and found the following link which explained it quite well
http://golf.about.com/cs/componentscustom/a/swingweight.htm
Hope someone has found this interesting as I have. Will still try the CG16s with the Mizunos first, but if the website is to be believed, the CG16s should be easier to strike a good ball??????
I'll let you all know (in a briefer and less train-spottingly boring thread) later
I looked at the relevant websites and saw that the swingweight of CG16s is D3 (9 iron to 3 iron), whereas the swingweight of the X22s is lighter at D0, despite the claim of Cleveland that their shafts are so much lighter than the competition.
When I pointed this out to the Centre of excellence and suggested I would try the CG16s (together with Mizuno JPX800 and MP53s (and my own X22) before deciding whether I would go to them for a fitting on the CG16s, they responded with the following:-
"A s/w point equates to approximately 1.8g so there may be a negligible difference between the CG16 and X22. The CG 16 is light in total weight - both shaft and grip are lighter than most competitor standards. As a result the s/w has to increase to maintain head speed among other engineering considerations"
As a result I did a bit of googling and found the following link which explained it quite well
http://golf.about.com/cs/componentscustom/a/swingweight.htm
Hope someone has found this interesting as I have. Will still try the CG16s with the Mizunos first, but if the website is to be believed, the CG16s should be easier to strike a good ball??????
I'll let you all know (in a briefer and less train-spottingly boring thread) later