chellie
Tour Winner
Can anyone recommend a similar ball or has anyone seen any good deals for them. Thanks
Where are you getting the compression numbers from? Is there some online source for this? I was googling it earlier and couldn't find anything.Well the facts are...
Ultisoft is 2 piece, 338 dimples, 40 compression. Cover about 60"thou.
Within the Srixon range this formulae is repeated with both the AD333 and Soft Feel balls. Same cover material and composition, same dimples, tiny variation in thickness (they are all either 57 or 63"thou) but the core compression vary. Soft Feel is 60, AD333 is 75.
Callaway supersoft is same construction, compression down at 38.
Titelist DT true soft is again similar construction, compression isn't given in specs but best estimate is around 55. Cover and dimples tweaked in 2018 model.
Wilson DX2 is similar in compression and construction.
Manufacturers specs, with the exception of Titelist who don't publish facts, just repeat marketing material over and over again, where it came from a test source.Where are you getting the compression numbers from? Is there some online source for this? I was googling it earlier and couldn't find anything.
The only one I actually know is that DX2 has the lowest compression around at 29, as they actually advertise that.
Each to their own.I like the AD333, good ball, but the Ultisoft is horrible, it's like hitting a lump of plasticine.
Each to their own.
I think hitting an AD333 is like hitting a lump of stone.
Yep, ultimately subjective.Guess it all depends on your swing speed and how you compress the ball, I dislike balls with a compression higher than 70-80, as those to me are like hitting stone, so the AD333 and the Tour version feel great to me.
So yes, it is very much each to their own, I totally agree.
Found some DX2 Optix in yellow for just under £10 a dozen so have ordered some to try. Seemed rude not to at that price.
Yes it's a 2 piece (as are most ball models in numerical terms), but it's got a Surlyn cover, and a pretty thick one, and whilst it's claims to be a soft compression there's no data on what that really means.The Drive is the two piece but I found it surprisingly good
I would suggest there is very little similarities but given the choice I'd go Drive over the Ultisoft which I found unresponsive and dead off the club face especially the putter. Not one I liked and would rather go AD333 or AD333 tour from the Srixon range. I just thought given the reference to the Drive I'd give the OP a chance to view my own viewsYes it's a 2 piece (as are most ball models in numerical terms), but it's got a Surlyn cover, and a pretty thick one, and whilst it's claims to be a soft compression there's no data on what that really means.
Really hard to draw many parallels to the Ultisoft...