Solhiem Cup

  • Thread starter Thread starter Deleted member 15344
  • Start date Start date
Slime said:
So utterly predictable.

Slime.
Click to expand...

Peterson has played well - the Europeans have played well and for one of their leaders to hole the winning putt would be a fitting end to a very good comp.
 
The coverage is absolutely shocking !! Missing so many shots that are crucial - Hull birdie and Masson shoves it right next to the pin on 18 ?! Yet we haven't seen anything
 
Slime said:
Why?

Slime.
Click to expand...

Well it appears from your posting that you wouldn't be happy with Peterson winning after calling her a "disgrace" earlier ?

Or does it get forgotten if she wins ?
 
Liverpoolphil said:
It's just an example of an accidental rule break - you can pick any of them

I think its massively unfair the amount of grief being heaped on people just for following the rules.
Click to expand...

And we all know what assumptions are ........................ and you make an awful lot of them!

Slime.
 
Slime said:
And we all know what assumptions are ........................ and you make an awful lot of them!

Slime.
Click to expand...

Bitter Taste

Sooner someone else won

Calling her a disgrace

It's quite easy to make assumptions when you post the above in relation to Peterson.

The US have won I'm pretty sure the US will lap up the karma.
 
Kellfire said:
Some of us want to play by the rules. Others want to waive the rules when it suits.

I know the type of person I'd rather be partnered with.
Click to expand...

That is a false characterisation of the rules. In match play the opponent has the right to enforce the rule or not. Choosing not to enforce is NOT waiving a rule, it is exercising a legitimate choice and what Pettersen should have done in my opinion.

I too know the sort of person I like to play with.
 
Ethan said:
That is a false characterisation of the rules. In match play the opponent has the right to enforce the rule or not. Choosing not to enforce is NOT waiving a rule, it is exercising a legitimate choice and what Pettersen should have done in my opinion.

I too know the sort of person I like to play with.
Click to expand...

It's very hard to judge her actions by using what we would do because none of us can contemplate what it's like to be in that situation.

It's not a knock about at the weekend

It's the biggest team comp in ladies golf

The fact that keeps being ignored is the girl was warned twice by her opponents the day before and even her pp warned her.


The US played wonderfully in the singles and deserved to win with that performance. Fully expect them to be humble in victory im sure
 
Ethan said:
That is a false characterisation of the rules. In match play the opponent has the right to enforce the rule or not. Choosing not to enforce is NOT waiving a rule, it is exercising a legitimate choice and what Pettersen should have done in my opinion.

I too know the sort of person I like to play with.
Click to expand...

I explained earlier how actually the only other option was for Lee to replace her ball under a one stroke penalty. The only way around that was for the Europeans to lie and say they conceded.

So you're suggesting the Europeans should've lied?
 
Kellfire said:
I explained earlier how actually the only other option was for Lee to replace her ball under a one stroke penalty. The only way around that was for the Europeans to lie and say they conceded.

So you're suggesting the Europeans should've lied?
Click to expand...
are you deliberately being obtuse?

The Europeans didnt need to enforce the penalty as Ethan has explained several times to you, that doesnt involve lying.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Z
Pineridge closure.
Replies
4
Views
604
Oddsocks
Oddsocks
dazlight
Icons golf.
Replies
15
Views
2K
Orikoru
Orikoru
C
2026 golf trips
2 3 4
Replies
63
Views
3K
nickjdavis
N
mikeb4
Golf Podcasts
2 3
Replies
55
Views
4K
Orikoru
Orikoru
jim8flog
Golf balls going hard
Replies
3
Views
567
harpo_72
harpo_72
Top