SwingsitlikeHogan
Major Champion
And so we find a shrine, comprising flowers and messages, being created outside the home of Richard Osborn-Brooks, the 78 yr old pensioner who is not being charged over the death of the career burglar Henry Vincent - a member of a large traveller family
Now what do we think of that?
We must all be allowed to grieve for those we love and lose regardless of who they are or what they have done. And if we are OK with the concept of such 'shrines' being at the place a life is lost - we see them all the time at the side of the road - then outside of this house in a public place?
I'm not a fan of public 'shrines' per se - but a little bit conflicted on this. Would be interesting to know how Mr Osborn-Brooks feels about what happened.
I actually think it's rather grim and gross...despite what I feel loved ones should be able to do to remember their loss - especially given what he had done and the subsequent threats to Mr Osborn-Brooks. But should his loved ones and daughter still be allowed to remember him in this way - his little daughter leaving a card and a teddy bear at the scene of her much loved daddies death.
Now what do we think of that?
We must all be allowed to grieve for those we love and lose regardless of who they are or what they have done. And if we are OK with the concept of such 'shrines' being at the place a life is lost - we see them all the time at the side of the road - then outside of this house in a public place?
I'm not a fan of public 'shrines' per se - but a little bit conflicted on this. Would be interesting to know how Mr Osborn-Brooks feels about what happened.
I actually think it's rather grim and gross...despite what I feel loved ones should be able to do to remember their loss - especially given what he had done and the subsequent threats to Mr Osborn-Brooks. But should his loved ones and daughter still be allowed to remember him in this way - his little daughter leaving a card and a teddy bear at the scene of her much loved daddies death.
Last edited: