Nice sentiment, but i’ve Never seen that rule written down. In the real world it’s happened for 1000’s of years and will continue to do so. It’s not right, and I admire your lofty ambition but they are just empty words.
should she be allowed back in the UK?
- Thread starter Tashyboy
- Start date
Nice sentiment, but i’ve Never seen that rule written down. In the real world it’s happened for 1000’s of years and will continue to do so. It’s not right, and I admire your lofty ambition but they are just empty words.
IanM
Journeyman Pro
- Joined
- May 18, 2009
- Messages
- 13,184
- Location
- Monmouthshire, UK via Guildford!
I wonder what you'd have to actually do to make Corbyn/Abbott say, "sorry pal, that's out of order, you aint coming back in!"
Instead we have "British Govt is to blame, now tell me what happened!"
Instead we have "British Govt is to blame, now tell me what happened!"
D
Deleted member 16999
Guest
Maybe we start by asking those who start these wars to keep it in their trousers or keep their legs closed.
Fade and Die
Medal Winner
Then she shouldn’t have gone out there and had kids!
Tashyboy
Please don’t ask to see my tatts 👍
Suprised that it has gone under the radar that the British government has revoked the British citizenship of two more ISIS brides. Yet nowt seems to of been said.
It has been on the news but they are not playing the same pr game as the original woman so it has not got the same legs.
Tashyboy
Please don’t ask to see my tatts 👍
Wondered if no new baby involved was part of the reason 🤔
Quite possibly. That gave the story an added angle for the press and they could see it being more than a one day wonder. A simple, ISIS bride stuck in refugee camp story isn't going to create much interest, as it hasn't.
robinthehood
Hacker
I see she has been granted legal aid to fight the citizenship case. Happy to be paying for that?
Hillsborough families (British Citizens) didn't get it, Millionaire Shoreham pilot got it, Lee Rigby Murderers got it, now this decision will set a precedent as all the other trapped Jihadist's will want it based on her case, at a reported £24m to the tax payer!
This country has gone to the wall!
woody69
Journeyman Pro
No it hasn't.
Maybe this will help you understand why she is entitled to Legal Aid - https://inews.co.uk/opinion/shamima-begum-legal-aid-secret-barrister/
Also, pretty sure the Hillsborough families were given legal aid.
Kellfire
Blackballed
Absolutely.
Foxholer
Blackballed
From 2012....
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uk...ees-for-families-of-Hillsborough-victims.html
From 2016.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-merseyside-37852267
Though it probably wasn't deemed 'Legal Aid' as such
D
Deleted member 18121
Guest
Entitled to and deserves to..... Two very different things in my book . And she definitely doesn't deserve any help.
Kellfire
Blackballed
You didn’t read the article, did you?
If she'd got the aid staright if the bat I would understand. But if we've removed her citizenship, surely she no longer has an entitlement
Kellfire
Blackballed
You didn’t read the article either, did you? The legal aid is to help decide if she can have her citizenship removed. It certainly looks likes she can’t.
Tashyboy
Please don’t ask to see my tatts 👍
I have no issue with her contesting the removal of her British citizenship (as long as she loses ), but if she wants to contest it. Let someone set up a crowdfunding page. I do not see why she should get legal aid ( ie taxpayers money) as she joined an organisation that never recognised western laws etc etc. But now she chooses to use said western laws to try to get back her British Citizenship.
Last edited:
I have no problem whatsoever with her getting legal aid. Anyone and everyone should be supported when contesting a prosecution brought by the State. She didn't get the chance to contest it in the first place, which in my opinion is wrong.
As to whether I think she should be allowed back into the UK, that's a separate issue in my eyes. For me its more about being able to contest her case on a level playing field with the State's resources.
As to whether I think she should be allowed back into the UK, that's a separate issue in my eyes. For me its more about being able to contest her case on a level playing field with the State's resources.
