should she be allowed back in the UK?

[Britishshooting]

Exactly this - she is a British National with a passport so she can’t be stopped coming and then she is assessed

They can and hopefully will strip her of her British Citizenship, she will then be stateless.

Why should someone who left the UK, to 'support' ISIS be allowed to return when it suits them? How many thousands of widowed women with children are in the refugee camps as a result of ISIS, maybe even this woman's husband (also governments but thats another topic). They're the ones that deserve a chance at a better life not people like this.

She has her ideology, she's expressed that and I agree in this day and age we are all entitled to our beliefs but there's a line where it doesn't work when people are intolerant to any other belief. She describes anybody opposed to ISIS as the 'enemy' how can you integrate such people into society?

The problem is they do integrate, they hide in the background, become calculated and then atrocities happen or they brainwash young children into doing their dirty work.

 

[HomerJSimpson]

Without showing any remorse for he actions I can't understand why we should let her into the country. She followed and supported a terrorist group (responsible for killing Brits) and so should be either told no or be allowed in for the good of the unborn child, which should then be taking into care at birth, and the mother arrested tried and imprisoned for a long time with no parole. I think it's time Britain took control of its borders (irrespective of Brexit) and finally decided who should and shouldn't enter and for to enforce those decisions

 

[chrisd]

When she left to join a terrorist organisation, as far as I'm concerned, that revoked her British citizenship and she should never be allowed to step on British soil ever again

 

[Robster59]

She's showing no remorse for what she's done. She's a member of a terrorist organisation and nothing in her statements leads me to believe that her viewpoint has changed.
If she has children, what's to stop her raising them with the same mindset? What's to stop her from influencing other people when she's over here.
It's a no from me. In my mind she has lost the right to that passport.

 

[Sweep]

The very fact that this is even being discussed shows how far gone this country is now.
No remorse. No regrets. Not fazed by severed heads in bins. Left to support pure evil. Left to support an organisation who want to kill any of us who are not Muslim. Left to support those who wish to kill British soldiers and civilians and indeed did so in the most horrendous way. Happy to see aid workers murdered in cold blood and the destruction of world heritage sites. Happy to see probably millions of lives ruined. Happy to see young children trained to commit the murder of innocent adults. The war on ISIS has cost millions of not billions. And now we should pay to look after her kid?
I find it frankly amazing that there are people on here who are prepared to take her back but who are less inclined to forgive someone who broke a rule at golf.
I am pretty sure though that anyone who wants to take her back won’t be too keen to take any responsibility if she comes back and commits a terrorist act.
And what message are we sending to those who may consider doing the same thing in the future? Give it a go. Go and fight for our enemies. You have nothing to lose. If we win you can come home, all is forgiven. If you win you can kill us all.

 

[Dando]

no doubt Lilly Allen will pipe up and say we should welcome her back

 

[Dibby]

From a pragmatic viewpoint, she is British and as she can not be left stateless her nationality cannot be stripped. So given this limitation, potentially she can be useful to intelligence as a "honeypot" for identifying other extremists if she is allowed to return, so she could actually be of some use.

 

[pokerjoke]

Didn’t she leave to join and support a terrorist organisation?

That’s alright though because she has a British passport,yeah right.

Seeing heads in bins would shock most people and leave an impression,not her totally unfazed.

 

[pokerjoke]

From a pragmatic viewpoint, she is British and as she can not be left stateless her nationality cannot be stripped. So given this limitation, potentially she can be useful to intelligence as a "honeypot" for identifying other extremists if she is allowed to return, so she could actually be of some use.

 

[AmandaJR]

No.

 

[Slab]

Isis terrorist: hi boss I asked to see you because while I quite enjoy my current role I really want to meet someone and start a family so I think I’m gonna give you my notice to quit

Isis terrorist boss: Ok I understand but we really don’t want to lose you. How about we bring a wife out here for you, that way you can carry on with us and start a family too. We’ve volunteers looking for a lad like you who are applying to come and help us

Isis terrorist; cool sounds like a plan

4 yrs later

Isis bride; Hi is that Britain? erm my terrorist hubby’s just been caught by the Syrian army, any chance I can have a flat in Basingstoke until another opportunity opens up? (P.s I’ll need help with childcare and jobseekers allowance)

Britain: Sure that sounds like something we can do….. Wait, what!

 

[Dando]

From a pragmatic viewpoint, she is British and as she can not be left stateless her nationality cannot be stripped. So given this limitation, potentially she can be useful to intelligence as a "honeypot" for identifying other extremists if she is allowed to return, so she could actually be of some use.

they can strip her of her nationality and in this case they should.
the only reason this piece of trash wants to come back is so she can get all the support (money) for her kid and I doubt for 1 minute she'll dish the dirt on ISIS.
Plus how much will it cost to keep her under surveillance?
IMO the only thing she should get is a bullet

 

[IanM]

No. She rejected the UK when she went off to support ISIS. She therefore lost her residency rights. If she hasnt, the law needs changing.

It is that simple.

(awaits accusation of islamaphopia)

 

[Beezerk]

When she left to join a terrorist organisation, as far as I'm concerned, that revoked her British citizenship and she should never be allowed to step on British soil ever again

I don't think she should have her citizenship revoked but I do think she should be tried as a terrorist as soon as she lands on this soil, then let the legal system do its thing. I fail to see how she could live a normal life anyway of she were to return, hate mobs on her case, probably the most despised Muslim in the country etc etc.

 

[Dibby]

they can strip her of her nationality and in this case they should.
the only reason this piece of trash wants to come back is so she can get all the support (money) for her kid and I doubt for 1 minute she'll dish the dirt on ISIS.
Plus how much will it cost to keep her under surveillance?
IMO the only thing she should get is a bullet

How? Legally you cannot leave someone stateless. ISIS is not a legally recognised state, and as far as I am aware she only has British nationality.

If you are referring to previous incidents where terrorists have been stripped of nationality, they have had dual nationality, so they were not left stateless when their British nationality was removed.

 

[Dan2501]

Let the wife of a terrorist, and supporter of a terrorist organisation back into the country? Someone that happily admits she wasn't fussed by the severed head of a non IS member because they were "An enemy of Islam. I thought only of what he would have done to a Muslim woman if he had the chance"? I don't think so, leave her in Syria. You've made your bed, now sleep in it. She's not coming back because she's changed her ideology or regrets anything she's done, no chance I'd let her back in.

 

[bobmac]

If she does come back, maybe she could join the Regent's Park mosque

 

[need_my_wedge]

The human side of me would like to let her come "home", but the cynical side of me thinks she is just doing it to get state handouts for the baby. The realist part of me says she left to support a terrorst group and enemy of our country, she married with an enemy of the country, she has no remorse for her actions. The cost to monitor her alone would be ridiculous because she can not be trusted. She should not be allowed back, and we should not show any remorse in that decision.

 

[Bunkermagnet]

No one has asked her what she would like any of her 3 attempted children (had the 2 previous made full term) to do once they were old enough.... follow in their fathers footsteps?
And stand by my previous comment.

 

[Deleted member 16999]

I’ve already said she shouldn’t be let back in and I fully respect those whose opinions differ and make some very valid points.
Why oh why do we have to then get the extremes of, the Country has gone and the welfare state etc etc.
We’ve allowed terrorists from all sorts of places to stay in the Country or their families, we’ve released them from prison in the UK.
She not the first, she’s simply the next one.
ISIS have been a terrorist group the likes of which we’ve never seen before and for their supporters there needs to be a special kind of hell.
It’s simply frustrating to see people use this case to once again have a dig at our Country.