AdamW
Active member
Should you not take the club as far back on wedges such as the s , pw , 60 degree compared to 7,8,9 irons ? If so how far back should you take it ?
Depends on how far you want to hit it..
Most people seem to use their wedges for shorter, finesse shots so they'll rarely go past a vertical shaft
Obviously, the further back you take the club the more speed you can generate and the further it will go
Not a lot of love for full shots with wedges but I do it all the time.
i hit full shots with a 52 and 58, i don't like hitting half shots with less club unless i'm running it in low into the wind
i much pref a full shotMe too. It is no doubt a fault, but I find that my best strikes are with a full swing. Half or three quarter swings are likely to be swings that go wrong.
I need to work on that. From comments on tv I think that most players prefer full swings??
I'm a Dave Pelz 'fan'.
His Short Game Bible describes a clockface technique that gives consistent distances - which is the key to the 'finesse' play with wedges.
None of those swings is 'full',
Indeed, I gave up on/opted out of the 7:30 swing. Could never get it smooth enough! Fine with 9:00 and 10:30 and 12:00 (my personal 'replacement'). So 'personalised' the method - and that works (worked) fine. The real 'key' that the system gives is confidence that a proper strike WILL go the desired distance. It's doubt over that that causes fluffs imo!I tried the Pelz method but found trying to hit exact 7 o'clock, 9 o'clock etc difficult and restrictive and I lost an amount of feel in the shots. I work hard on feeling a 30 or 40 yard shot (not always successfully) but I totally agree with you that none of the shots would ever be played fully
Should you not take the club as far back on wedges such as the s , pw , 60 degree compared to 7,8,9 irons ? If so how far back should you take it ?
Totally which is why I found the linear method such an effective crutch to my short game woes. I am fighting hard to revert to a more orthodox method and it is coming but there is a nagging doubt that for pitching in particular, linear works better with a greater margin of error. either way whatever you choose I agree that committing to the sure is paramountIndeed, I gave up on/opted out of the 7:30 swing. Could never get it smooth enough! Fine with 9:00 and 10:30 and 12:00 (my personal 'replacement'). So 'personalised' the method - and that works (worked) fine. The real 'key' that the system gives is confidence that a proper strike WILL go the desired distance. It's doubt over that that causes fluffs imo!
There are other methods of achieving similar consistancy that are equally effective. The key is finding something that you are comfortable with - and practicing it!
Indeed, I gave up on/opted out of the 7:30 swing. Could never get it smooth enough! Fine with 9:00 and 10:30 and 12:00 (my personal 'replacement'). So 'personalised' the method - and that works (worked) fine. The real 'key' that the system gives is confidence that a proper strike WILL go the desired distance. It's doubt over that that causes fluffs imo!
There are other methods of achieving similar consistancy that are equally effective. The key is finding something that you are comfortable with - and practicing it!
Should you not take the club as far back on wedges such as the s , pw , 60 degree compared to 7,8,9 irons ? If so how far back should you take it ?