D
Deleted Member 1156
Guest
No. You are just a (mod edit)
Oh dear
Last edited by a moderator:
No. You are just a (mod edit)
I heard she has acute angina![]()
I think its all just a cunning stunt by her PR people.
Careful mate, seems there are easily offended people online right now![]()
The mistake was failing to realise it had been added to the banned list.
My gut feeling is that it is a genuine mistake and appears to be doing exactly the right thing in coming out and saying so and more importantly not really trying to mitigate the situation but recognising the seriousness and accepting any consequences. Not a great situation but I don't think history will judge her too harshly once the inevitable hullabaloo has blown over.
Just caught the end of a story on the news and it looks like Nike have withdrawn their sponsorship of Sharapova over this. Can't help but think there must be more to the story as Nike still sponsor Gatlin who has twice been banned for taking performance enhancing drugs. Can't see why they'd keep supporting a known drug cheat but drop Sharapova so quickly.
Well my judgement of her is based surely on her as opposed to her looks - maybe it's being too trusting but I also wonder how much of the judgments are also based on the current problem with Russia and the clear drug issue they have in Athletics ?
So she's been caught using a product (for the last 10 yrs) that's now on the banned list..and didn't realise it's now on the list? She's just a cheat and has been abusing the system to get away with it.
I think the worst you can say about her is she is a cheat since Jan 2016 and she has come clean and admitted her mistake. If she was taking a PE drug then the authorities are at fault for not banning it sooner.
I think the worst you can say about her is she is a cheat since Jan 2016 and she has come clean and admitted her mistake. If she was taking a PE drug then the authorities are at fault for not banning it sooner.
you would surely then have to question her ethics. using a performance enhancing drug (while it was legal) is that fairplay?
To look at it from a completely different angle, would you let your kids take legal highs? they are legal, not banned or illegal, so whats the issue? (not aimed at you D4S! Rhetorical Q for all)
Abusing the system is cheating. She is a cheat simples.
Good question but I would have to say yes. Surely everyone else would be doing it? I guess it's the golfing equivalent of using a long putter.....not illegal (obviously now is) but some say it created an advantage.
Prior to this year, which rule did she break?
you would surely then have to question her ethics. using a performance enhancing drug (while it was legal) is that fairplay?
To look at it from a completely different angle, would you let your kids take legal highs? they are legal, not banned or illegal, so whats the issue? (not aimed at you D4S! Rhetorical Q for all)
We are inundated with requests to test for legal highs (in hair). However, there are (or can be) an almost infinitesimal number of compounds which will need to be tested for. Once each one has a method for analysis, it is made illegal. That's the cue for a slight change in compound when it will become legal again.
Phishing in the wind![]()
There is a supplement that natural bodybuilders take that is just as good, if not better than banned steroids. It was first called trembombs until that got banned. They changed one compound and relabeled it testo power. That also got banned. Today its called sd matrix and available on ebay.
My point is that the drug companies are always one step ahead. It must be an uphill battle for official governing bodies