Sharapova

  • Thread starter Thread starter Deleted member 15344
  • Start date Start date
All becoming a bit of a nonsense, caffeine reduces the time to muscle failure by up to 10%, they tried banning that but couldn't work it so caffeine is ok again, I doubt this stuff Sharapova was on would offer gains like that but it does seem like damage limitation time from her and her team, agree its odd Nike have dropped her quick when she's such a sellable asset yet they back Gatlin the drug cheat sprinter. The diabetes/heart condition thing sounds far fetched, she was looking for any legal edge she could get on the competition. Alain Baxter lost an olympic bronze skiing medal for UK for having taken a sniff on a Vicks inhaler which had some ephidrene in it in US version unbeknownst to him which we all sympathised with BUT ultimately its part of your job as a professional sportsperson to analyse carefully everything that you put into your body and keep up to speed with all updates on what you can and cant take and if ok in what measures. If you make an exception for one case it's a precedent for others, zero tolerance is the only way.
 
It will all come out in the wash. I happen to know that they have to disclose all medication and supplements that they use before any samples arw given. So if she's been using this substance for 10 years then they'll be 10 years of records of her disclosing this medication.

I personally dont buy it. She has a team of personal trainers and nutritionist around her and no doubt people that are in the know enough to tell her on the new banned list
 
Careful mate, seems there are easily offended people online right now :eek:

I'm offended by the offense I have not yet taken offense to. And I saw the acute angina joke on a card in Sainsburys today. A card which could be seen by children!!!! Oh the horror.
 
The mistake was failing to realise it had been added to the banned list.

My gut feeling is that it is a genuine mistake and appears to be doing exactly the right thing in coming out and saying so and more importantly not really trying to mitigate the situation but recognising the seriousness and accepting any consequences. Not a great situation but I don't think history will judge her too harshly once the inevitable hullabaloo has blown over.

I'd like to believe that it was a genuine mistake. I also believed Lance Armstrong. And from what I'm seeing from some posts on here from people whose medical knowledge far exceeds mine, it looks like I might be disappointed again.

Just caught the end of a story on the news and it looks like Nike have withdrawn their sponsorship of Sharapova over this. Can't help but think there must be more to the story as Nike still sponsor Gatlin who has twice been banned for taking performance enhancing drugs. Can't see why they'd keep supporting a known drug cheat but drop Sharapova so quickly.

I don't think Nike have a hard and fast line on this; did they not also stand by Tiger Woods? I know it's not exactly the same circumstances, but it was cheating of a sort but they didn't have a problem then. Be interesting to see the figures in this case and the others to see if that reveals a reason for the quick drop?
 
Well my judgement of her is based surely on her as opposed to her looks - maybe it's being too trusting but I also wonder how much of the judgments are also based on the current problem with Russia and the clear drug issue they have in Athletics ?

Mine is based purely on her looks.
 
So she's been caught using a product (for the last 10 yrs) that's now on the banned list..and didn't realise it's now on the list? She's just a cheat and has been abusing the system to get away with it.
 
So she's been caught using a product (for the last 10 yrs) that's now on the banned list..and didn't realise it's now on the list? She's just a cheat and has been abusing the system to get away with it.

I think the worst you can say about her is she is a cheat since Jan 2016 and she has come clean and admitted her mistake. If she was taking a PE drug then the authorities are at fault for not banning it sooner.
 
I think the worst you can say about her is she is a cheat since Jan 2016 and she has come clean and admitted her mistake. If she was taking a PE drug then the authorities are at fault for not banning it sooner.

you would surely then have to question her ethics. using a performance enhancing drug (while it was legal) is that fairplay?

To look at it from a completely different angle, would you let your kids take legal highs? they are legal, not banned or illegal, so whats the issue? (not aimed at you D4S! Rhetorical Q for all)
 
Ok, so I take it that the drug in question is available over the counter? If not, then she's taking a prescription only drug. If it is available over the counter, then why isn't it available elsewhere in the world?

Genuine questions.
 
I think the worst you can say about her is she is a cheat since Jan 2016 and she has come clean and admitted her mistake. If she was taking a PE drug then the authorities are at fault for not banning it sooner.


Abusing the system is cheating. She is a cheat simples.
 
you would surely then have to question her ethics. using a performance enhancing drug (while it was legal) is that fairplay?

To look at it from a completely different angle, would you let your kids take legal highs? they are legal, not banned or illegal, so whats the issue? (not aimed at you D4S! Rhetorical Q for all)

Good question but I would have to say yes. Surely everyone else would be doing it? I guess it's the golfing equivalent of using a long putter.....not illegal (obviously now is) but some say it created an advantage.

Abusing the system is cheating. She is a cheat simples.

Prior to this year, which rule did she break?
 
Good question but I would have to say yes. Surely everyone else would be doing it? I guess it's the golfing equivalent of using a long putter.....not illegal (obviously now is) but some say it created an advantage.



Prior to this year, which rule did she break?

if she was prescribed it without a genuine reason then she's a cheat. If she has a genuine reason for the prescription then she's had plenty of opportunity to find a better medication.
 
you would surely then have to question her ethics. using a performance enhancing drug (while it was legal) is that fairplay?

To look at it from a completely different angle, would you let your kids take legal highs? they are legal, not banned or illegal, so whats the issue? (not aimed at you D4S! Rhetorical Q for all)

We are inundated with requests to test for legal highs (in hair). However, there are (or can be) an almost infinitesimal number of compounds which will need to be tested for. Once each one has a method for analysis, it is made illegal. That's the cue for a slight change in compound when it will become legal again.

Phishing in the wind :(
 
We are inundated with requests to test for legal highs (in hair). However, there are (or can be) an almost infinitesimal number of compounds which will need to be tested for. Once each one has a method for analysis, it is made illegal. That's the cue for a slight change in compound when it will become legal again.

Phishing in the wind :(

There is a supplement that natural bodybuilders take that is just as good, if not better than banned steroids. It was first called trembombs until that got banned. They changed one compound and relabeled it testo power. That also got banned. Today its called sd matrix and available on ebay.

My point is that the drug companies are always one step ahead. It must be an uphill battle for official governing bodies
 
There is a supplement that natural bodybuilders take that is just as good, if not better than banned steroids. It was first called trembombs until that got banned. They changed one compound and relabeled it testo power. That also got banned. Today its called sd matrix and available on ebay.

My point is that the drug companies are always one step ahead. It must be an uphill battle for official governing bodies


Yes it is an uphill battle, but those taking the "supplement" know what they are doing and will carry on until they get caught or something else comes along.
 
Top