I've seen the jazzy golfer and Mia Baker on social media recently. Both keen golfers but bang average ability wise yet both have been signed up as ambassadors and given various contracts. Just so happens that both are very attractive with fit bodies. Thought in this day and age it was wrong to sexualise women. Unless of course it suits them. Total hypocrisy.
Sarah Stirk? Hetti dripping tap?
So you don't think the fact that Dougherty has won multiple events and knows golf and was at the end of his playing career had anything to do with him getting the Sky gig?I don't think I did, because that isn't relevant. The relevant part is Jazzy Golfer has 55k followers on Instagram. Mia Baker has 74k.
Plenty of other former golfers meet those requirements as well!So you don't think the fact that Dougherty has won multiple events and knows golf and was at the end of his playing career had anything to do with him getting the Sky gig?
I've never thought of Jazzy Golfer as being on the same level as Paige Spiranac and the like. I just thought she was a keen amateur who'd built up a decent following on Instagram - obviously she is easy on the eye but you could argue that for a vast number of celebrities in all walks of life and for both sexes really. Would Nick Dougherty be heading up Sky's coverage if he wasn't such a handsome chap? Probably not.
Do you think they would get the same exposure if they were 18st and looked like they've been hit by a bus?
Of course they do but how many presenters do you think Sky can employ at any time?Plenty of other former golfers meet those requirements as well!
Ok, he was just a name I threw out but the point was all brands will prefer to go for healthy, good-looking people who have a large following to represent them. It's not rocket surgery.Nick Dougherty was given a chance because of what he accomplished in the sport - he was a multiple tour event winning - just like other pundits and presenters.
It’s massively different from an Amatuer beginner
???????Any port in a storm Rodney, any port in a storm
????
My point is more to do with how they gained their followers rather than the endorsements which naturally followed.But you're comparing apples and oranges.
Nick Dougherty is the face of Sky Sports Golf and is therefore required to have some degree of experience, success and knowledge of the game.
Mia Baker and Jazzy Golfer are two amateurs who happen to have a large online presence with a lot of "interactions" with their followers, which is crucial for brands looking for ambassadors. Success and experience isn't required at all.
Now, how they got their followers in the first place might give your argument some credibility but the difference is that they built up their followers first, and the brands came second.
If someone less attractive had the same number of followers and a high degree of interactions then yes, they'd be just as likely to get the same level of sponsorships.
Look at bad golf and tubes and ange golf life for examples.
My point is more to do with how they gained their followers rather than the endorsements which naturally followed.
I don't think a fat, bald, middle aged 18capper would amass the same number of followers.
Maybe if you put your hat on straight to show the logo to its fullest, the sponsors would come flooding in ????Wish I'd not chosen to focus on brands that are all now defunct.
With my good looks I'm sure I'd have had a few sponsorship deals by now.
View attachment 41021
rather than the jazzy golfer you could be the beige and Velcro golferWish I'd not chosen to focus on brands that are all now defunct.
With my good looks I'm sure I'd have had a few sponsorship deals by now.
View attachment 41021
You couldn't handle her.........personalityI follow both and chuckle when they rave about the latest stuff that they’ve just been given for free.
Give me Paige whatshername any day of the week