Scotland Debate

D

Deleted member 18588

Guest
After you have explained why you think there will be a run on the Scottish banks.
BTW I don't think there are any Scottish [or English] banks......they are all international now.

I was not aware that I had suggested there would be a run on Scottish, or any other, banks.

As you say banks are largely international these days and some effectively have HQ's in more than one country.

BTW like the kid in the HSBC advert I'm happy to accept anyone's banknotes but, like you, I have had problems using Scottish notes round here when I have returned from Scotland. Bloody annoying for a pro-union man like myself!
 
Last edited by a moderator:

SwingsitlikeHogan

Major Champion
Joined
Jul 24, 2012
Messages
33,337
Visit site
I'm currently reading Neil Ascherson's Stone Voices: The Search for Scotland Pub 2003). Ain interesting look at what made Scotland - with his insights into the Scottish psych in respect of devolution and independence - before and after the 1979 and 1997 referendum. One thought on the 1979 referendum was that Scots were simply feart (notwithstanding the 40% rule) - and the 1997 referendum was (rather obviously) so strongly influenced by 18yrs of Conservative Westminster government and the affinity (or lack of it) that Scots felt towards the governments of those 18yrs.

Reading it I get a bit of a sinking feeling that in the event of a NO (Which I think is likely) Scotland and Scots will never feel the same again about their country. For a start they can forget singing stuff like Scots Wha Hae and Flower of Scotland - maybe no bad thing for the latter given how it is murdered these days.

But so much of the Scottish identity seems to me to be tied up with a distinct feeling that we are a little bit different and could and can do things our own way and better given the chance. Well the chance is being presented and it will be rejected.
 
Last edited:

Old Skier

Tour Winner
Joined
May 10, 2013
Messages
9,608
Location
Instow - play in North Devon
Visit site
and could and can do things our own way and better given the chance.

I presume you mean those Scots that remained in Scotland and not the Anglo Scots that seemed to inhabit the south and the west of England in ever increasing numbers.

Would a yes vote stop the exodus as they (according to your statement) can do everything better when someone gives them a chance so iscot would obviously be the place to be.

posted in this way to stop me getting a slapped wrist.
 

Doon frae Troon

Ryder Cup Winner
Joined
Mar 5, 2012
Messages
19,031
Location
S W Scotland
Visit site
Australian PM Tony Abbot in strange statement about Scottish Independence.

Something about a bad day for justice and freedom.........really.

We have our own justice system and we wish to have our freedom.... like Australia
He [or his wife] must be after a knighthood.
 

SocketRocket

Ryder Cup Winner
Joined
Sep 12, 2011
Messages
18,151
Visit site
Australian PM Tony Abbot in strange statement about Scottish Independence.

Something about a bad day for justice and freedom.........really.

We have our own justice system and we wish to have our freedom.... like Australia
He [or his wife] must be after a knighthood.

We don't have freedom anymore. We have a dictatorship ruled by High Court Judges that make up Laws for us.
 

SwingsitlikeHogan

Major Champion
Joined
Jul 24, 2012
Messages
33,337
Visit site
Back in May Danny Alexander tells the voters of Scotland NO means £1400 better off by 2015-16

http://www.eveningtimes.co.uk/news/...after-no-vote-says-danny-alexander.1401273125

Today I read of a poll that surveys attitudes of voters in England towards Scotland following a NO and we discover that they would want a cut to Scottish annual public spending of almost £1,400 per person a year.

http://www.heraldscotland.com/polit...ill-pay-a-heavy-price-for-referendum.25092377

Perhaps coincidental that the figures are the same - but the views of voters south of the Border if Scotland says NO comes as no surprise to me at all.

Seems to me that the Westminster politicians really need to think about what the 'south of border' public will be demanding of a NO Scotland and come up with some reassurances.
 
Last edited:

CheltenhamHacker

Journeyman Pro
Joined
Apr 22, 2013
Messages
1,933
Location
Cheltenham
Visit site
Back in May Danny Alexander tells the voters of Scotland NO means £1400 better off by 2015-16

http://www.eveningtimes.co.uk/news/...after-no-vote-says-danny-alexander.1401273125

Today I read of a poll that surveys attitudes of voters in England towards Scotland following a NO and we discover that they would want a cut to Scottish annual public spending of almost £1,400 per person a year.

http://www.heraldscotland.com/polit...ill-pay-a-heavy-price-for-referendum.25092377

Perhaps coincidental that the figures are the same - but the views of voters south of the Border if Scotland says NO comes as no surprise to me at all.

Seems to me that the Westminster politicians really need to think about what the 'south of border' public will be demanding of a NO Scotland and come up with some reassurances.

From a Scottish newspaper. Let me guess, the Herald is also pro Yes? Can't say I have come across this opinion much "down here". Westminster probably have more important issues than "reassuring" about something that may or may not happen.
 
D

Deleted member 15344

Guest
I won't be demanding anything after a NO vote - I will be happy that the UK will still be as one

Why would I demand more money ?

Seems a lot of spin from people desperate for a yes vote
 

SwingsitlikeHogan

Major Champion
Joined
Jul 24, 2012
Messages
33,337
Visit site
From a Scottish newspaper. Let me guess, the Herald is also pro Yes? Can't say I have come across this opinion much "down here". Westminster probably have more important issues than "reassuring" about something that may or may not happen.

Future of England Survey 2014 - see also Guardian today

http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2014/aug/20/scottish-independence-referendum-english-attitudes

The Herald has not yet stated it's position. The Sunday Herald (separate newspaper) is YES
 

SwingsitlikeHogan

Major Champion
Joined
Jul 24, 2012
Messages
33,337
Visit site
I won't be demanding anything after a NO vote - I will be happy that the UK will still be as one

Why would I demand more money ?

Seems a lot of spin from people desperate for a yes vote

It's got nothing to do with the YES campaign. See Leader in today's Scotsman (most probably a NO). Scots to be punished for flirting with independence??

http://www.scotsman.com/news/leader-comment-english-opinion-on-independence-1-3514693

The same survey says that the vast majority of voters south of the border want Scotland to stay in the UK, but that if it goes it's own way then it should be on it's own.

I was a bit surprised that the majority in the survey would not want rUK/Westminster to support a Scotland application to join the EU or NATO. Not whether they think Scotland would get in - but that they don't seem to WANT Scotland in the EU or NATO. Even although with the latter Scotland is talked of by BT as if it is a cornerstone of NATO. If you want Scotland in the EU and/or NATO you'd surely want your politicians to support any applications.
 
Last edited:
D

Deleted member 15344

Guest
It's got nothing to do with the YES campaign. See Leader in today's Scotsman (most probably a NO). Scots to be punished for flirting with independence??

http://www.scotsman.com/news/leader-comment-english-opinion-on-independence-1-3514693

The same survey says that the vast majority of voters south of the border want Scotland to stay in the UK, but that if it goes it's own way then it should be on it's own.

I was a bit surprised that the majority in the survey would not want rUK/Westminster to support a Scotland application to join the EU or NATO. Not whether they think Scotland would get in - but that they don't seem to WANT Scotland in the EU or NATO. Even although with the latter Scotland is talked of by BT as if it is a cornerstone of NATO. If you want Scotland in the EU and/or NATO you'd surely want your politicians to support any applications.

If Scotland want independence then have it without the need of the support of the rest of the nations they have decided to leave

It appears it's not really independence is it - it's taking bits to do on their own but wanting help with other bits.
 

Val

Ryder Cup Winner
Joined
Dec 31, 2011
Messages
12,422
Location
Central Scotland
Visit site
Back in May Danny Alexander tells the voters of Scotland NO means £1400 better off by 2015-16

http://www.eveningtimes.co.uk/news/...after-no-vote-says-danny-alexander.1401273125

Today I read of a poll that surveys attitudes of voters in England towards Scotland following a NO and we discover that they would want a cut to Scottish annual public spending of almost £1,400 per person a year.

http://www.heraldscotland.com/polit...ill-pay-a-heavy-price-for-referendum.25092377

Perhaps coincidental that the figures are the same - but the views of voters south of the Border if Scotland says NO comes as no surprise to me at all.

Seems to me that the Westminster politicians really need to think about what the 'south of border' public will be demanding of a NO Scotland and come up with some reassurances.

Did you get asked by an official poll about this? If not then do you know anyone who has been asked by an official poll? And again if not, what sort of credibility does the poll have if it states it's findings as " four to one - 56 per cent as opposed to 12 per cent"

And again I'd argue four to one dramatises the figure when in reality it's not even close as it's 56 people in every 100 that allegedly think this with 12 people saying no and by assumption the remain 32 people don't know or don't care.
 

Adi2Dassler

Journeyman Pro
Joined
Aug 14, 2009
Messages
1,868
Visit site
From a Scottish newspaper. Let me guess, the Herald is also pro Yes? Can't say I have come across this opinion much "down here". Westminster probably have more important issues than "reassuring" about something that may or may not happen.


The Herald is not pro yes.The Sunday Herald is.They have separate editorial positions and that's been made very clear.
 
Top