must be soon, anyone?
no-one then
must be soon, anyone?
I agree, we don't like threats.There is bound to be a currency union if there is a yes vote.
rUK economy could not take a 10/12% devaluation plus the loss of oil/whisky/food etc tax revenue.
Most of Scotland are not impressed/intimidated with the naesayers attempted 'poker face'.
no-one then
Golf tourists just need a HDID certificate. The others can join the big queue.
no-one then
We can afford to be independant if we want to.
England is turning to the right and will continue to do so. We don't want Tory/UKIP leadership.
Me still Undecided.
No currency union and removing 5 million users of £ would have some kind of knock-on effect to the value of that currency, so would the value of the £ on international money markets begin to slide?Would the Euro/$/Yen/Rouble become more attractive to the markets?Would The City be seen as attractively as it is now?
Negativity/ Lies of the naesayers.
Sorry for being slow but you'll need to run that by me again. If we're still using the pound, albeit without a formal union, in what sense are 5 million users removed? Is that in some sort of macro-economic sense?
I guess what I would like to know is the impact on the individual. So, for example, my assumption with a currency union is that my savings will be worth the same amount..... but how are they impacted without a union?
Apologies, I was meaning with Scotland not using the £
As for your question on savings, do you mean with scotland still using the £ or not?
There is a plan b/c/d, it's in the white paper, its there for all to see.
b= use the £, no currency union
c= new scottish currency, set up a new central bank
d= use the euro
b= no currency union, rUK continues with the same level of debt but the balance of payments is higher due to no oil/gas/whiskey/renewables/manufacturing from Scotland being taken into consideration.The value of the £ is reduced as 9% of its users are no longer there.Issue for Scotland is we have no lender of last resort, no technical currency, which is the problem for rejoining EUNot the wind and pish we're being fed, and the sole reason Salmond won't/can't say it on TV
c= all of the above re: rUK problems and the financial issues for Scotland in setting up new currency
d= not ideal right now, I'd maybe be open to this in 5/10 years.
It's not offered in the white paper. The white paper said they look at all options but it said it's preferred option is a union, it doesn't elaborate on the other options.
I stopped when it got to here
So does this mean you do not wish an iscot to join the EU.I'd be keen on a new Scottish Currency.
So does this mean you do not wish an iscot to join the EU.
Correct.Or NATO.
EFTA/UN/Commonwealth/UEFA for me.
It's not offered in the white paper. The white paper said they look at all options but it said it's preferred option is a union, it doesn't elaborate on the other options.
Not FIFA, I notice - good choice!
This is driving me a wee bit demented this aftie, I'm convinced I've heard the jambo make reference to plan b/c/d, and this is the table I've seen him use as reference-
http://yes2014.net/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/planb.jpg
Taken that link from here> http://yes2014.net/2014/08/07/currency-crash-course-plan-a-b-c-d-they-do-exist/