Blue in Munich
Crocked Professional Yeti Impersonator
He’s twisting your tail Phil. Just his usual trolling for a reaction.
Rather like one of our recently departed members...
He’s twisting your tail Phil. Just his usual trolling for a reaction.
Why don’t you watch it then ?
You have posted a lot in the thread questioning people about their own reactions from what appears some sort of high ground looking to prove a point and you haven’t even bothered to watch the clip so you would at least be posting from a level of knowledge of the incident - but you haven’t so I’m guessing you are just looking to stir something up.
Watch it - form some sort of opinion and then preach if you so wish
I often wonder about that when I read stuff on this forum 😧...My first thought when I saw it was that he isn’t playing with a full deck.
The clip is linked in the first post, why not watch it and tell us how you feel about it rather than question others reaction, maybe you’ll see a different point of view or understand why some feel as they do.
Did you find his language offensive?Right I've watched it, and yes it's unpleasant, am I offended by it ? Absolutely not, why would I ?
Right I've watched it, and yes it's unpleasant, am I offended by it ? Absolutely not, why would I ?
Did you find his language offensive?
Never asked for you to be offended on someone else’s behalf, I asked if you found his language offensive.It is not for me to be offended on someone else's behalf, the only person or persons who should be offended by that are those who were subjected to it.
Would you say he was racially abusive?
But you don’t find racial abuse as offensive?Yes, absolutely.
But you don’t find racial abuse as offensive?
I kind of agree with this. I don’t find it offensive personally as it’s not directed at me. I find it shocking & I’m sympathetic to the woman that was abused. What she was subjected to has no place in modern civilised society. Would I have intervened? Like to think I would based on the aboveI haven't said that at any time. I have questioned why someone would be offended at the actions of someone being racially offensive to someone else when they weren't there, and is offended retrospectively, just seems very bizarre. Its like those folk who find out about something on telly days after the fact, despite having never seen it, and then go out their way to make a complaint about it.![]()
I’m offended by his outburst, not on behalf of the woman, I’m offended as a human being that this world we live in breeds such embarrassing creatures as him.I haven't said that at any time. I have questioned why someone would be offended at the actions of someone being racially offensive to someone else when they weren't there, and is offended retrospectively, just seems very bizarre. Its like those folk who find out about something on telly days after the fact, despite having never seen it, and then go out their way to make a complaint about it.![]()
I’m offended by his outburst, not on behalf of the woman, I’m offended as a human being that this world we live in breeds such embarrassing creatures as him.
Why when someone says they find offense in something or are offended it’s naturally assumed to be on behalf of someone else.
It’s perfectly acceptable to be offended based on your own values and standards.
How can you expect it to be took any other way when you admit not watching the clip, despite it being linked in the op?That's fair enough and it's also perfectly acceptable to question it and try and debate it, unless it's on here of course cause when you try and debate anything you get called a troll, how very novel.
As it happens, I find very little to be offended about in life, it's only feelings afterall and sticks and stones etc etc.
How can you expect it to be took any other way when you admit not watching the clip, despite it being linked in the op?
Be careful what you post if any threads involving pets are started
But I don’t understand how you can say my reason for being offended is “fair enough†and then in your next post saying when it’s retrospective and not involving them, you don’t get it.Regardless of the clip or not, I just cannot understand how one can be offended by something that doesn't involve them, which is one thing, but for someone not to have even been there and then to be retrospectively offended by it just seems a very strange concept, but apparently if I try and debate as such, I'm a troll
I do accept that folk can be more or less offended at certain things, that's fair enough, but retrospectively when it doesn't involve them
Pets ?? No idea what you're talking about but I am an animal lover and a hypocrite![]()