fundy
Ryder Cup Winner
Rhodri Tash, I can see it now lol
Rhodri Tash, I can see it now lol
D
Deleted member 15344
Guest
Didnt take Pep long to teach Rhodri to commit foul after foul without getting booked
Perfect replacement for Fernandinho then 😆
PJ87
Journeyman Pro
It’s MP tash
We played some great football last season but he has really put his stamp on the team this season
I don’t think we will have a chance in this one but beats last seasons start
PJ87
Journeyman Pro
Love you VAR 😂
fundy
Ryder Cup Winner
gotta love the old 4mm offside decision
sawtooth
Tour Winner
No not quite 98 again. Probably more like 90. Very hard even for a team like City to keep that level going.
So Sterling was inside was he?
Looked line another wonky line when they checked it to me.
Looked line another wonky line when they checked it to me.
PJ87
Journeyman Pro
I thought was off but not gonna argue with VAR
It’s quick and decisions seem correct
Dan2501
Tour Winner
Sterling looked so annoyed Aguero didn't let him take the pen VAR involved again, going to take some getting used to, but at least we're getting the right decisions.
VAR involved again, going to take some getting used to, but at least we're getting the right decisions.
PJ87
Journeyman Pro
Sterling looked so annoyed Aguero didn't let him take the pen
Quick aswell wouldn’t you say?
Dan2501
Tour Winner
Yeah, process certainly seems to have been streamlined, been pretty impressed so far has to be said.
Dan2501
Tour Winner
Hat-trick for Sterling. Brilliant from him, and completely dominant from City. They're winning the league again, made it look easy today.
PJ87
Journeyman Pro
Thing is tho it’s one game live atm
Would be interested to see them cope with the 3pm ones
Tashyboy
Please don’t ask to see my tatts 👍
It sounds welsh ðŸ˜
Sounds like a STD 😜
Imurg
The Grinder Of Pars (Semi Crocked)
Just been trying find the criteria for use of VAR...
The phrase that keeps popping up is "clear error"
If the VAR team are reviewing situations and they see an error that is not clear ( to those on the pitch) then surely they can't overturn an onfield decision.
Now, I haven't seen the game this lunchtime but word is that there was an offside given by VAR that measured a matter of inches.
If that's the case then the onfield officials haven't made a "clear" error...an error - yes. But not a clear one.
I don't have a problem with VAR as such but if the definition of "clear error" morphs into any error no matter how miniscule then there's going to be a lot of decisions overturned.
You could also question whether any onfield officials are needed to make decisions if VAR is going to make them instead. Just have a ref on field to implement VAR decisions.....
fundy
Ryder Cup Winner
i think all goals are to be checked for offside arent they?
2 offsides couldve gone either way depending on at what point the ball was actually kicked (hard to be exact).
if you showed someone who didnt watch football the 2 examples and said that one stood and one didnt theyd never watch the game again lol
D
Deleted member 15344
Guest
Blimey - all after just the one game
Think the clear and obvious has gone out of the window - they pretty much have two refs now , one on the pitch and anything missed will be relayed through , and every offside will be looked at regardless of clear and obvious. For me it’s a poor change in direction , think it’s not long before celebrating stops until they watch a screen
fundy
Ryder Cup Winner
at least it gave the West Ham fans something to cheer today 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Imurg
The Grinder Of Pars (Semi Crocked)
According to the piece I've just read VAR can ONLY get involved if a clear error has been spotted.
It's that word "clear" again....
If they're going to review everything then just say "we're going to review everything" and then at least people will have an idea.
