Premier League 2019-2020 we’re off

  • Thread starter Deleted member 15344
  • Start date

Orikoru

Tour Winner
Joined
Nov 1, 2016
Messages
27,765
Location
Watford
Visit site
In your opinion though. As a spurs fan

Newcastle fans would say correct call

Neutrals are mainly in favour of the decision given
I admit when I'm biased, but on this occasion it genuinely looks so stonewall to me. Like the most blatant penalty you'll ever see in your life. I admit when I have doubts about things, or I can see the other point of view, but this is absolutely 100% stonewall. I was just sat in my living room laughing like a madman when they didn't give it. It was totally ludicrous.
 

Kellfire

Blackballed
Joined
Jul 11, 2009
Messages
7,580
Location
Leeds
Visit site
I admit when I'm biased, but on this occasion it genuinely looks so stonewall to me. Like the most blatant penalty you'll ever see in your life. I admit when I have doubts about things, or I can see the other point of view, but this is absolutely 100% stonewall. I was just sat in my living room laughing like a madman when they didn't give it. It was totally ludicrous.

It was and most unbiased viewers will agree entirely with you.

It’s laughable that he claimed Newcastle fans would all say it was a correct call; he’s basically admitting that he himself is biased towards his club. And given who that club is, it’s no wonder he’s pretending it shouldn’t have been a penalty to Spurs.
 

PJ87

Journeyman Pro
Joined
Apr 1, 2016
Messages
21,870
Location
Havering
Visit site
I admit when I'm biased, but on this occasion it genuinely looks so stonewall to me. Like the most blatant penalty you'll ever see in your life. I admit when I have doubts about things, or I can see the other point of view, but this is absolutely 100% stonewall. I was just sat in my living room laughing like a madman when they didn't give it. It was totally ludicrous.

I’ve seen it, a fair few times

It’s 6 of one half a dozen of the other

Kane looking for contact as he always does, takes the ball away from the defender who looses his footing

Can see why it wasn’t given

Then because it isn’t a massive error and their is still doubt it is upheld because it’s down to interpretation..
 

PJ87

Journeyman Pro
Joined
Apr 1, 2016
Messages
21,870
Location
Havering
Visit site
It was and most unbiased viewers will agree entirely with you.

It’s laughable that he claimed Newcastle fans would all say it was a correct call; he’s basically admitting that he himself is biased towards his club. And given who that club is, it’s no wonder he’s pretending it shouldn’t have been a penalty to Spurs.

You clearly have never read anything I have posted about spurs as I have stated many many times I have no issue with spurs and don’t understand how they are our rivals ...

Our rivals are and always will be millwall
 

Orikoru

Tour Winner
Joined
Nov 1, 2016
Messages
27,765
Location
Watford
Visit site
I’ve seen it, a fair few times

It’s 6 of one half a dozen of the other

Kane looking for contact as he always does, takes the ball away from the defender who looses his footing

Can see why it wasn’t given

Then because it isn’t a massive error and their is still doubt it is upheld because it’s down to interpretation..
It was a massive error! :ROFLMAO: They missed a stonewall penalty!

"Looking for it" is absolutely not an aspect of the laws. If I was 'looking for' a penalty, and a defender wipes me out, that's still a penalty. 'Looking for it' is a completely irrelevant phrase when making a penalty decision. It's like if a player provokes another one into punching him, are you going to say it's not a red card because the player who got punched was looking for it? No of course not.
 

clubchamp98

Journeyman Pro
Joined
Jan 23, 2014
Messages
17,899
Location
Liverpool
Visit site
It was a massive error! :ROFLMAO: They missed a stonewall penalty!

"Looking for it" is absolutely not an aspect of the laws. If I was 'looking for' a penalty, and a defender wipes me out, that's still a penalty. 'Looking for it' is a completely irrelevant phrase when making a penalty decision. It's like if a player provokes another one into punching him, are you going to say it's not a red card because the player who got punched was looking for it? No of course not.
Yes I think that’s a pen.
You should be worried about the defending for their goal though.
 

fundy

Ryder Cup Winner
Joined
Aug 6, 2010
Messages
27,053
Location
Herts/Beds border
Visit site
I tried to reply to the most absurd post from fishcake (but it’s vanished) regarding lpool being the only home team to win this weekend.

Villa started the weekends games off with a home win! Not sure who against? Some tinpot team I’m guessing...

my mistake, i posted that! been a long weekend completely forgot about Friday night being this weekend!
 

Orikoru

Tour Winner
Joined
Nov 1, 2016
Messages
27,765
Location
Watford
Visit site
I think it’s more the time the lad had to pick the pass.
Just no pressure on the ball.
They only had one striker but he still found him.
Yeah I just watched them say that on match of the day as well. :LOL: Nah, genuinely it was the same for Villa's goal on the opening day, just an acre of space between Sanchez and Rose down the left, and attackers are getting in easily. All it takes is for them to talk to one another and react but they're not doing it.
 

PJ87

Journeyman Pro
Joined
Apr 1, 2016
Messages
21,870
Location
Havering
Visit site
We were awful yesterday, very lucky to get a point.
But one thing I can take away from the game, at least I don't have to watch Burnley every week. Complete anti football. Wasting time from the 5th minute. Pathetic.

Burnley are the Bolton / stoke of the league

We finally got rid of those 2 anti football and another springs up
 
Top