D
Deleted Member 1156
Guest
The PGA tour have announced that they will trial lasers in a couple of selected events on the Web.com tour. A sound idea in my opinion, hopefully it will help to speed up play but we'll see.
The PGA tour have announced that they will trial lasers in a couple of selected events on the Web.com tour. A sound idea in my opinion, hopefully it will help to speed up play but we'll see.
I'm all for it on the off chance it makes them faster but I doubt it, they will still take ages figuring out all sorts of yardages like carry numbers over bunkers, front/back edges, backstops etc. Getting the initial number is not what makes them slow imo.
Agree with this..
Distance to the pin isn't what takes the time..
It's things like McGirt last week taking 2 minutes to miss a 15 foot putt after stalking it from every conceivable angle and using Aimpoint...
Why wasn't he penalised? I thought there was a time limit on shots.....
I'm all for it on the off chance it makes them faster but I doubt it, they will still take ages figuring out all sorts of yardages like carry numbers over bunkers, front/back edges, backstops etc. Getting the initial number is not what makes them slow imo.
Most tour pros regularly aim away from the flag.Would this suffice for tour players though, I'm wondering if golfers of that standard would 'just' laser the flag
Isn't distance to the pin just one of the measures they work off when calculating their shot meaning they'll still refer to a book or course guide for distances the laser wont get like front/back/ two thirds on etc etc
So if pros use 4-5 distance measures for a shot and the rangefinder can get 1-2 is there really any time saved
edit: or are rangefinders really that good these days that it could accurately target the fringe at front/back of the green