Paul Nutter

Actually I called him a racist sexist bigot based on what he has said - I have no idea who Adam Bienkov , it was an article that was posted on my Facebook no need to google

But none of that matters and is just a deflection away from the person's view which in my eyes are racist and sexist and make him a bigot. As per usual you don't actually challenge what the article says more try and demean someone's opinion that may differ from yours

If you agree with Nuttals views then I would put you in the same category as him

Some might argue that you are doing the same

I disagree with pretty well everything that Nuttall is quoted as saying in that article, but I will uphold his right to have those opinions.

Feel free to disagree with those opinions, but don't go labelling others here who don't agree with you.

learn to agree to disagree, its an art form
 
Farage, would that be the man who's political presence has shaken the entire world? Must have something about him that people take notice of.

If people like you get their way in frustrating the will of the majority voter then I believe Nuttall will become a very influential Politician indeed.

Do you mean the will of 37% of eligible voters, or 22% of the total UK population?
 
Farage......the man who led his party to one MP status.:lol:

Yes but that's down the the first past the post system and gerrymandering that has gone on over the centuries by both major parties.

Even though I do not really want to see UKIP in any position of power and influence, I think we need PR in the UK more than we have ever done to try and drive through some consensus politics and get politicians working more together. Before we disappear further into the hellhole that is US political debate where it just constant disagreement with whatever the other party says (that's indeed if they ever do say anything about policies), before they have even listened to what they have said.
 
Yes but that's down the the first past the post system and gerrymandering that has gone on over the centuries by both major parties.

Even though I do not really want to see UKIP in any position of power and influence, I think we need PR in the UK more than we have ever done to try and drive through some consensus politics and get politicians working more together. Before we disappear further into the hellhole that is US political debate where it just constant disagreement with whatever the other party says (that's indeed if they ever do say anything about policies), before they have even listened to what they have said.

Totally agree. Westminster needs drag itself out of the last century and adopt the Scottish voting system.
 
Farage, would that be the man who's political presence has shaken the entire world? Must have something about him that people take notice of.

If people like you get their way in frustrating the will of the majority voter then I believe Nuttall will become a very influential Politician indeed.

I cannot frustrate 'the will of the people' if I do not know what that is other than 'leave EU' - and I do not wish that to be frustrated because - yes - that could lead to Nuttall having a very important part in the political life of this country, and IMO that would be disastrous for the social cohesion and well-being of this country.

And btw leaving the EU is not 'the will of the people' - it is the will of the small majority of 'the people' who voted for leave, and they do not speak for me.

In talking of 'Leave' 'being 'the will of the people' you ignore the will of the large minority voter, and I believe that doing so will cause significant issues in the future were Brexit to not be quite as magical as it is painted by that small majority.

But hey - the Complainers will continue to moan that we 'losers' won't shut up. Well we won't until there is evidence that we are being properly listened to and our views, worries and concerns are being taken into account. And I doubt I will hear much of that from Paul Nuttall.
 
Last edited:
Nuttall supporting Banks view to kick Scotland out of the UK.
They will have to change their name then, not sure how that will play out with their party members.

BTW Nicola receiving a great ovation in RoI.
Probably not being reported in 'The News Where We Are'.

It will be interesting to understand how he would do that. Unless (god forfend) it's just words to appeal to a certain constituency of voter
 
Did he not also lead them to victory in a UK wide election?


I'm not a fan of either the party or the man but you have to acknowledge what he has achieved. Incidentally, his win ratio in referendums is better than the SNP's, 1 for 1 rather than 0 for 2 in recent history. He has certainly left his mark on UK politics.
 
Do you mean the will of 37% of eligible voters, or 22% of the total UK population?

Until the UK adopts something like the Australian voting system, and there's a number of parties, we will alway have governments who don't represent a majority.
 
It does strike me as strange that in today's political world it seems to mean that losing a democratic vote is effectively the same as winning it and, therefore, any vote lost by a small difference is considered to be good reason to keep voting until we get the decision that the losers wanted

Apart from Scotland, Scotland, Brexit and America I don't think your logic has much credit :whoo:
 
Until the UK adopts something like the Australian voting system, and there's a number of parties, we will alway have governments who don't represent a majority.

I have always been a fan of proportional representation, but the big two ie Labour and the Tories would not want it as they would be the main losers. I think that is why the radical Farage and others that say it is wrong get lambasted because they don't play the " look after ourselves game".
 
But hey - the Complainers will continue to moan that we 'losers' won't shut up. Well we won't until there is evidence that we are being properly listened to and our views, worries and concerns are being taken into account. And I doubt I will hear much of that from Paul Nuttall.

And how would the views, worries and concerns of those that voted Leave have been taken into account if the vote had been reversed? Do you really think that they would have been addressed at all or do you think that the UK would have simply carried on being a member of the EU with absolutely no changes?

Which takes us right back to the question that you have been asked several times and have refused or failed to answer............

If the result had gone the other way and Remain had won what concessions would have been given to those that voted Leave?
 
I have always been a fan of proportional representation, but the big two ie Labour and the Tories would not want it as they would be the main losers. I think that is why the radical Farage and others that say it is wrong get lambasted because they don't play the " look after ourselves game".

Oh I think Farage is just the same as the others when it comes to selfish reasons and looking after his interests, don't fall for the man of the people schtick. Yes he has played his hand and portrayed a certain image very well, but he is just as interested in looking after the interests of his party as Labour or the Conservatives are.
 
And how would the views, worries and concerns of those that voted Leave have been taken into account if the vote had been reversed? Do you really think that they would have been addressed at all or do you think that the UK would have simply carried on being a member of the EU with absolutely no changes?

Which takes us right back to the question that you have been asked several times and have refused or failed to answer............

If the result had gone the other way and Remain had won what concessions would have been given to those that voted Leave?

We'll never know but if it would have been close the other way then I'd of expected that there would be more concessions to the UKIP point of view by the tories. Plus I would not have been surprised if Cameron (or whoever would have been in charge) would have used the closeness of the vote as a bargaining chip with the EU to extract more concessions.

Of course this is all guesswork, but I imagine they would have taken a pragmatic view on it with the need to retain power and not have conservative MPs and voters drifting off to UKIP paramount in their their thoughts. After all, that's why they called the damn thing in the first place.
 
Some might argue that you are doing the same

I disagree with pretty well everything that Nuttall is quoted as saying in that article, but I will uphold his right to have those opinions.

Feel free to disagree with those opinions, but don't go labelling others here who don't agree with you.

learn to agree to disagree, its an art form

I'm a bit confused here - whose opinion am I demeaning ? Nuttal or Socket as Socket didn't actually post an opinion more a comment about googling an article and as I said in my post the response didn't actually concentrate on what the article said but more about the person who posted the article and myself using google ?
 
Top