Paul Nuttall

For a party that has 4 million supporters you would think they would have the ability to select at least one electable leader.

Why?
Labour can't....

Wot!! Labour have no elected MP's scandal:confused:

You see, Soon, you really need to read what's written by yourself and others..
You said " a party of 4 m supporters...........As above.

I said Why, Labour can't

You say Wot Labour have no elected MPs..
Where do you get that from?

I am now bowing out from all Political threads from this moment.
It's just petty point scoring and trolling.
 
You see, Soon, you really need to read what's written by yourself and others..
You said " a party of 4 m supporters...........As above.

I said Why, Labour can't

You say Wot Labour have no elected MPs..
Where do you get that from?

I am now bowing out from all Political threads from this moment.
It's just petty point scoring and trolling.

Elected MP to lead the party.
I do not think UKIP have ever had one.


Maybees we got our wires crossed.:cool:

BTW if you want an example of trolling I should re-read your post 39.
Hope your meeting goes well.
 
Last edited:
Elected MP to lead the party.
I do not think UKIP have ever had one.


Maybees we got our wires crossed.:cool:

BTW if you want an example of trolling I should re-read your post 39.
Hope your meeting goes well.

Even worse when you're answering Imurg and quote Khamelion,

Now that's what I call getting your wires crossed.

Oooops ;)
 
Did a good job tonight? Hmmm - maybe for the other four leaders. His one-in-one-out proposal for immigration went down a hoot. Rather scoffed at as being The Supreme Leader's representative in this evening's Leaders Debate.

As Carolyn Lucas said - There isn't a single question to Paul Nuttall that the answer isn't immigration
 
Last edited:
Why on earth was the leader of a party with no MP's and less than a handful of local councilors even there.
He was made to look a fool, and his comments were met by either total silence or laughter from the well behaved ITV audience.
He was so out of touch that he could not even remember the names of his fellow debaters

Even more stupid was the Tory and Labour HQ staffs negative tweeting whilst the debate was going on.
That was the debate that their leaders were feart to attend.
 
Last edited:
Why on earth was the leader of a party with no MP's and less than a handful of local councilors even there.
He was made to look a fool, and his comments were met by either total silence or laughter from the well behaved ITV audience.
He was so out of touch that he could not even remember the names of his fellow debaters

Even more stupid was the Tory and Labour HQ staffs negative tweeting whilst the debate was going on.
That was the debate that their leaders were feart to attend.
The Muppet show has always been entertaining, the full house was there tonight. What a pack of numpties, shame Corbers didnt join them.
 
The Muppet show has always been entertaining, the full house was there tonight. What a pack of numpties, shame Corbers didnt join them.

I can imagine the fuss from the blue side if Brown hadn't turned up in 2010. Cameron to his credit had the balls to do a few of them in 2015.
 
The Muppet show has always been entertaining, the full house was there tonight. What a pack of numpties, shame Corbers didnt join them.

You complain about name-calling. At least The Supreme Leader signifies strength, stability and leadership. The Muppets, numpties are not quite so complimentary. So why be so disparaging about the leaders of five parties? So you don't like them. Well tough - it's called democracy and opposition - something that The Supreme Leader would like to stamp on.
 
Why on earth was the leader of a party with no MP's and less than a handful of local councilors even there.
He was made to look a fool, and his comments were met by either total silence or laughter from the well behaved ITV audience.
He was so out of touch that he could not even remember the names of his fellow debaters

I'm guessing that the clue was in the title "Leaders Debate" and as leader of the party was entitled to be there.

Got to give these minority, one policy parties their moment in the spotlight............... hence the SNP leader also being there. :) (<------- that was a joke by the way, but it was such an open goal I couldn't pass it up).

Re the bit in bold - I think you're giving him too much credit. I don't think anyone "made" him look a fool. I think he manages that all on his own with no outside help.
 
You complain about name-calling. At least The Supreme Leader signifies strength, stability and leadership. The Muppets, numpties are not quite so complimentary. So why be so disparaging about the leaders of five parties? So you don't like them. Well tough - it's called democracy and opposition - something that The Supreme Leader would like to stamp on.

Speaking of The Supreme Leader

https://wingsoverscotland.com/the-warning-signs/#comments
 
Looking forward to Nuttall launching the UKIP manifesto...and then explaining how their one-in-one-out immigration policy will work and satisfy our labour needs.

Of course I also expect him to be slamming The Supreme Leader for her wobbliness under the slightest pressure and serious questioning; and questioning her ability to stand up to the hard men of the EU negotiation team - with him predicting a May 'cave-in' and a less than total severing with the EU - yes - that total severing being the 'failure' that May has implied will be dire for us.

But he'll be going for it.
 
Last edited:
Look I've asked several times for electioneering posts to be suspended until main campaigning restarts on Friday.

What part of this request are you having difficulty with?
 
Top