Voyager EMH
Slipper Wearing Plucker of Pheasants
I accept your own answer to your own question.Superior to what then? The word superior is used to rank something against something of lesser standard
I accept your own answer to your own question.Superior to what then? The word superior is used to rank something against something of lesser standard
Well, I'm glad you accept my definition.I accept your own answer to your own question.
Better let Royal Ashdown Forest know that their's is an inferior course then. Featured many times in "top 100 courses" lists.
They could have just said 'do what you want' - it would have been much quicker. There is no perfect answer to this. The best solution I've seen (short of every group having a man with a rake following them around!) is the pipes driven into the ground that then hold the rakes vertically by the handle.
I don’t know why more courses don’t do this.Braemar at the top of Royal Deeside - Scotlands highest 18 hole course - has no bunkers. Their ‘hazards’ instead of sandy hollows are to have mounds with long-ish grass.
You are unlikely to get a good lie nor a level stance if you land on one of them which makes your next shot often much more difficult than if you were in a sand bunker!
Just had a look at the images of Braemar on their website. Looks beautiful to me.
It appears to have a superior design to all courses that are less well designed than it is.
I acknowledge that this would apply to all but the worst designed course in the world.![]()
Someone recently was praising Braemar to me. Sounded as if it belonged to the hidden gem category. Nearest I've played is Ballater, in 1962 I think, which I remember as a pleasant flat course alongside the Dee. It must be about 6 or 7 years now since it was a pleasant flat course under the Dee and must be well recovered by now. I wonder - if it has bunkers- if there were any salmon left stranded when the waters receded.
Colin - Ballater is flat - does have bunkers - is beside the Dee ( having been under it as you say) and I’m playing there on Wednesday.
Like most of the Deeside courses it’s well worth a visit. You can also play Aboyne, Banchory, Peterculter, and Paul Lawrie’s 9 holer as well as at least 4 other 9 hole courses - Torphins, Tarland, Lumphanan and Inchmarlo.
Not forgetting the fairly forgetttable Deeside GC
Inchmarlo went bust. Paul Lawrie took on the range and 9 holer for a year or two but now concentrates on his Golf Centre (previously Aspire). Not sure who owns Inchmarlo now but the Holiday complex was the cause of its downfall I believeI agree, the Deeside courses are in stunning surroundings, particularly Ballater. Whatever happened to the 18 holer at Inchmarlo? Played it a few times when Banchory was shut.
Some might go as far to say that a course with no bunkers is of inferior design as it lacks a fundamental feature of a golf course.
Yeah not a fan. They've made a great complex otherwise with the clubgouse and practice facilities, but it was at the cost of what used to be a decent 18, much worse with the "American" holes in play.Colin - Ballater is flat - does have bunkers - is beside the Dee ( having been under it as you say) and I’m playing there on Wednesday.
Like most of the Deeside courses it’s well worth a visit. You can also play Aboyne, Banchory, Peterculter, and Paul Lawrie’s 9 holer as well as at least 4 other 9 hole courses - Torphins, Tarland, Lumphanan and Inchmarlo.
Not forgetting the fairly forgetttable Deeside GC
It's now (still) owned ostensibly by the Burnett's under the Inchmarlo Land Co. Plan was the big hotel that they've never been able to get past planners, which would have funded the regeneration of the 18 holer. Now they're slowly selling off the former holiday houses and flats, many of which are then being used as Air BnBsInchmarlo went bust. Paul Lawrie took on the range and 9 holer for a year or two but now concentrates on his Golf Centre (previously Aspire). Not sure who owns Inchmarlo now but the Holiday complex was the cause of its downfall I believe
I am finding it 'interesting' that in a thread headed 'New Rules w.e.f. January 2023' we are talking about the merits of golf courses without bunkers and about golf courses we like.it is wonderfully ironic that in a thread headed New Rules w.e.f. January 2023
Why do you think they are different?It would be nice if the rules regarding when a ball is deemed “out of bounds” and when a ball is in a penalty area could be aligned and consistent. Anyone know why they are different?