Mizuno mp h5 is it a blade

Na... I would not. I guess from the shape you could argue muscle back but it has a cavity so defiantly not a blade in my opinion.
 
No it isn't a blade. It had a blade like profile from the ball's viewing point, but the sole is thickened by the cavity more than a blade. It does blend in quite well with short iron blades, though.
 
The old Mizuno cut muscle design :thup:

Same in the MP67 too, although not as pronounced.

Correct! Though while I knew the 32s were 'cut muscle', the other numbers escaped me. There seemed no pattern to the numbering system around that time! I had MP30s, which I think morphed into MP60s. MP37 (have also had) arrived about the same time that were blades/MBs. Were the 37s a progression from the 33s? or were the, different styled, 32s a regression of them?

That was actually the point Mizuno lost me as a customer! Though discovering Miura Blades might have had something to do with that!
 
Top